{"title":"A Lower Bound on the List-Decodability of Insdel Codes","authors":"Shu Liu;Ivan Tjuawinata;Chaoping Xing","doi":"10.1109/TIT.2023.3302862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For codes equipped with metrics such as Hamming metric, symbol pair metric or cover metric, the Johnson bound guarantees list-decodability of such codes. That is, the Johnson bound provides a lower bound on the list-decoding radius of a code in terms of its relative minimum distance \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, list size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and the alphabet size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$q$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. For study of list-decodability of codes with insertion and deletion errors (we call such codes insdel codes), it is natural to ask the open problem whether there is also a Johnson-type bound. The problem was first investigated by Wachter-Zeh and the result was amended by Hayashi and Yasunaga where a lower bound on the list-decodability for insdel codes was derived. The main purpose of this paper is to move a step further towards solving the above open problem. In this work, we provide a new lower bound for the list-decodability of an insdel code. As a consequence, we show that unlike the Johnson bound for codes under other metrics that is tight, the bound on list-decodability of insdel codes given by Hayashi and Yasunaga is not tight. Our main idea is to show that if an insdel code with a given Levenshtein distance \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$d$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n is not list-decodable with list size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, then the list decoding radius is lower bounded by a bound involving \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$d$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. In other words, if the list decoding radius is less than this lower bound, the code must be list-decodable with list size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. At the end of the paper we use such bound to provide an insdel-list-decodability bound for various well-known codes, which has not been extensively studied before.","PeriodicalId":13494,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","volume":"69 11","pages":"6989-7002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10210400/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For codes equipped with metrics such as Hamming metric, symbol pair metric or cover metric, the Johnson bound guarantees list-decodability of such codes. That is, the Johnson bound provides a lower bound on the list-decoding radius of a code in terms of its relative minimum distance
$\delta $
, list size
$L$
and the alphabet size
$q$
. For study of list-decodability of codes with insertion and deletion errors (we call such codes insdel codes), it is natural to ask the open problem whether there is also a Johnson-type bound. The problem was first investigated by Wachter-Zeh and the result was amended by Hayashi and Yasunaga where a lower bound on the list-decodability for insdel codes was derived. The main purpose of this paper is to move a step further towards solving the above open problem. In this work, we provide a new lower bound for the list-decodability of an insdel code. As a consequence, we show that unlike the Johnson bound for codes under other metrics that is tight, the bound on list-decodability of insdel codes given by Hayashi and Yasunaga is not tight. Our main idea is to show that if an insdel code with a given Levenshtein distance
$d$
is not list-decodable with list size
$L$
, then the list decoding radius is lower bounded by a bound involving
$L$
and
$d$
. In other words, if the list decoding radius is less than this lower bound, the code must be list-decodable with list size
$L$
. At the end of the paper we use such bound to provide an insdel-list-decodability bound for various well-known codes, which has not been extensively studied before.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Information Theory is a journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers concerned with the transmission, processing, and utilization of information. The boundaries of acceptable subject matter are intentionally not sharply delimited. Rather, it is hoped that as the focus of research activity changes, a flexible policy will permit this Transactions to follow suit. Current appropriate topics are best reflected by recent Tables of Contents; they are summarized in the titles of editorial areas that appear on the inside front cover.