Comparison of ESD Damage Test for Common-Mode Chokes With ESD Gun and TLP-HMM

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI:10.1109/LEMCPA.2022.3222019
Hironori Ito;Masahiro Yoshida;Yusuke Yano;Jianqing Wang;Takeshi Ishida;Masanori Sawada
{"title":"Comparison of ESD Damage Test for Common-Mode Chokes With ESD Gun and TLP-HMM","authors":"Hironori Ito;Masahiro Yoshida;Yusuke Yano;Jianqing Wang;Takeshi Ishida;Masanori Sawada","doi":"10.1109/LEMCPA.2022.3222019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method of electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage test for common-mode chokes has been standardized in IEC 62228–5 Annex E. However, there is a concern about the reproducibility of the ESD damage test using the ESD gun described therein. Against this background, the possibility of replacing the ESD gun with a transmission line pulse–human metal model (TLP-HMM) was investigated. The results of the ESD damage test using the ESD gun and TLP-HMM are found to be similar but not exactly the same, especially at low frequencies. Moreover, due to the different waveform generation principles and circuit configurations of the ESD gun and TLP-HMM, even if a load of the same structure is used to calibrate the ESD gun and TLP-HMM, when they are applied to other loads, it is still difficult to guarantee that the discharge currents are the same. The findings raise an issue on how to define a standard TLP-HMM so that it could provide the worst test result compared to the ESD gun.","PeriodicalId":100625,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","volume":"5 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9953951/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The method of electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage test for common-mode chokes has been standardized in IEC 62228–5 Annex E. However, there is a concern about the reproducibility of the ESD damage test using the ESD gun described therein. Against this background, the possibility of replacing the ESD gun with a transmission line pulse–human metal model (TLP-HMM) was investigated. The results of the ESD damage test using the ESD gun and TLP-HMM are found to be similar but not exactly the same, especially at low frequencies. Moreover, due to the different waveform generation principles and circuit configurations of the ESD gun and TLP-HMM, even if a load of the same structure is used to calibrate the ESD gun and TLP-HMM, when they are applied to other loads, it is still difficult to guarantee that the discharge currents are the same. The findings raise an issue on how to define a standard TLP-HMM so that it could provide the worst test result compared to the ESD gun.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用ESD枪和TLP-HMM对共模扼流圈进行ESD损伤测试的比较
共模扼流圈的静电放电(ESD)损伤测试方法已在IEC 62228-5附录E中进行了标准化。然而,使用其中描述的ESD枪进行ESD损伤测试的再现性存在问题。在此背景下,研究了用传输线脉冲-人体金属模型(TLP-HMM)取代ESD枪的可能性。发现使用ESD枪和TLP-HMM的ESD损伤测试结果相似,但并不完全相同,尤其是在低频下。此外,由于ESD枪和TLP-HMM的波形产生原理和电路配置不同,即使使用相同结构的负载来校准ESD枪和TLC-HMM,当它们被施加到其他负载时,仍然难以保证放电电流相同。这些发现提出了一个问题,即如何定义标准TLP-HMM,使其能够提供与ESD枪相比最差的测试结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Cover Table of Contents Synopsis of the March 2025 Issue of the IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications IEEE ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY SOCIETY The Challenge of Surge Protection for LiFePO4 Batteries Using Varistors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1