A Comparative Performance Analysis of 6T & 9T SRAM Integrated Circuits: SOI vs. Bulk

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1109/LEMCPA.2022.3163963
Qazi Mashaal Khan;Richard Perdriau;Mohamed Ramdani;Mohsen Koohestani
{"title":"A Comparative Performance Analysis of 6T & 9T SRAM Integrated Circuits: SOI vs. Bulk","authors":"Qazi Mashaal Khan;Richard Perdriau;Mohamed Ramdani;Mohsen Koohestani","doi":"10.1109/LEMCPA.2022.3163963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter evaluates the performance of 6T & 9T static random access memory (SRAM) cells, for data stability and power metrics, with the aim to compare silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and bulk CMOS technologies. Each SRAM topology was designed & simulated in 180 nm 5 V XFAB-SOI and AMS-bulk processes, using optimized parameters and compatible devices. The fundamental variables analyzed were read noise margins, write trip current & voltage as well as leakage current (LC) and static power dissipation (SPD) under process and temperature (PT) variations. The static noise margin (SNM) butterfly curve and N-curve methodologies were used to assess the mentioned parameters. Compared to bulk technology, the SRAM cells designed with SOI were found to have lower SPD & LC, higher data stability, lower write ability, larger sensitivity to process variations and higher resilience to temperature deviations.","PeriodicalId":100625,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","volume":"4 2","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9747925/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This letter evaluates the performance of 6T & 9T static random access memory (SRAM) cells, for data stability and power metrics, with the aim to compare silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and bulk CMOS technologies. Each SRAM topology was designed & simulated in 180 nm 5 V XFAB-SOI and AMS-bulk processes, using optimized parameters and compatible devices. The fundamental variables analyzed were read noise margins, write trip current & voltage as well as leakage current (LC) and static power dissipation (SPD) under process and temperature (PT) variations. The static noise margin (SNM) butterfly curve and N-curve methodologies were used to assess the mentioned parameters. Compared to bulk technology, the SRAM cells designed with SOI were found to have lower SPD & LC, higher data stability, lower write ability, larger sensitivity to process variations and higher resilience to temperature deviations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
6T与9T SRAM集成电路的性能比较分析:SOI与Bulk
这封信评估了6T和9T静态随机存取存储器(SRAM)单元在数据稳定性和功率指标方面的性能,目的是比较绝缘体上硅(SOI)和体CMOS技术。每个SRAM拓扑结构都是在180 nm 5V XFAB-SOI和AMS批量工艺中设计和模拟的,使用优化的参数和兼容的设备。分析的基本变量是读取噪声裕度、写入跳闸电流和电压以及工艺和温度(PT)变化下的漏电流(LC)和静态功耗(SPD)。静态噪声裕度(SNM)蝶形曲线和N曲线方法用于评估上述参数。与块体技术相比,使用SOI设计的SRAM单元具有更低的SPD和LC、更高的数据稳定性、更低的写入能力、更大的工艺变化敏感性和更高的温度偏差弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Cover Table of Contents Synopsis of the March 2025 Issue of the IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications IEEE ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY SOCIETY The Challenge of Surge Protection for LiFePO4 Batteries Using Varistors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1