Learning management system as a necessary element of blended learning

O. Andryushkova, M. Gorbunov, A. Kozlova
{"title":"Learning management system as a necessary element of blended learning","authors":"O. Andryushkova, M. Gorbunov, A. Kozlova","doi":"10.21686/1818-4243-2017-3-80-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the given work was to study approaches to the choice of software platforms for supporting distance, blended and e-learning. The article presents brief information about the evolution of e-learning systems, and the explanation is given of using the term “blended learning” in case of applying it. The results of comparative analysis are given for systems of managing content and education process exemplified by Moodle 3.2 and DiSpace 2.0, the latter of which is an updated version of a software platform developed by Novosibirsk State Technical University. The following characteristics of e-learning systems were studied: functionalities of modules and subsystems; terms of authorization, installation and support; interface convenience and other parameters. The results are given of polling students about evaluating the indicators of the quality of DiSpace 2.0 e-learning environment (interface friendliness, communication convenience, functional completeness) and electronic educational-methodical complex (availability, content completeness, presentation convenience, involvement in the educational process, topicality). It is pointed in the conclusion, that regardless of the particular learning management system, it should meet the main criteria imposed to basic platforms: openness, expendability, stability, documented nature, and constant development.","PeriodicalId":55672,"journal":{"name":"Otkrytoe Obrazovanie Moskva","volume":"21 1","pages":"80-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otkrytoe Obrazovanie Moskva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2017-3-80-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The objective of the given work was to study approaches to the choice of software platforms for supporting distance, blended and e-learning. The article presents brief information about the evolution of e-learning systems, and the explanation is given of using the term “blended learning” in case of applying it. The results of comparative analysis are given for systems of managing content and education process exemplified by Moodle 3.2 and DiSpace 2.0, the latter of which is an updated version of a software platform developed by Novosibirsk State Technical University. The following characteristics of e-learning systems were studied: functionalities of modules and subsystems; terms of authorization, installation and support; interface convenience and other parameters. The results are given of polling students about evaluating the indicators of the quality of DiSpace 2.0 e-learning environment (interface friendliness, communication convenience, functional completeness) and electronic educational-methodical complex (availability, content completeness, presentation convenience, involvement in the educational process, topicality). It is pointed in the conclusion, that regardless of the particular learning management system, it should meet the main criteria imposed to basic platforms: openness, expendability, stability, documented nature, and constant development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习管理系统是混合式学习的必要组成部分
这项工作的目的是研究选择支持远程、混合和电子学习的软件平台的方法。本文简要介绍了电子学习系统的发展,并对“混合学习”一词的使用进行了解释。以Moodle 3.2和DiSpace 2.0为例,给出了内容管理和教育过程系统的比较分析结果,后者是新西伯利亚国立技术大学开发的软件平台的更新版本。研究了电子学习系统的以下特点:模块和子系统的功能;授权、安装和支持条款;接口方便性等参数。问卷调查了学生对DiSpace 2.0电子学习环境质量指标(界面友好性、交流便利性、功能完备性)和电子教育方法复杂性指标(可用性、内容完备性、呈现便利性、教育过程参与性、话题性)的评价结果。在结论中指出,无论具体的学习管理系统如何,它都应该满足基础平台的主要标准:开放性、消耗性、稳定性、文档性和持续发展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Weight Gain and Affecting Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients in the First 2 Years After Transplant. Perception of Space in the Traditional and Virtual Classroom Modernization of the Educational Demonstration Stand as A Way to Improve the Quality of Practical Training of Future Engineers Optimization of the Pedagogical Process in Teaching Chemistry to First-Year Students of the Ural State Medical University Digital Competence Profiles in Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1