Revegetation of upland eroded bare peat using heather brash and geotextiles in the presence and absence of grazing

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Mires and Peat Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.19189/MAP.2019.AJB.STA.1902
S. Watts
{"title":"Revegetation of upland eroded bare peat using heather brash and geotextiles in the presence and absence of grazing","authors":"S. Watts","doi":"10.19189/MAP.2019.AJB.STA.1902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revegetation of eroded bare peat is commonly facilitated by the import of artificial resources and genetic material (lime, seed and fertiliser), but such techniques are less suitable for remote upland locations with sensitive local flora. Using a BACI (Before-After-Control-Impact) approach, this study explores the effectiveness of alternative treatments (heather (Calluna vulgaris) brash cut onsite and two types of geotextiles) in the following four years at grazed and ungrazed sites at Ben Lawers National Nature Reserve. After an initial colonisation, the mean vegetation cover in grazed plots degraded to 9.4 %, demonstrating that restoration using these methods is impeded by trampling impacts of large herbivores. The vegetation cover and number of indicator species increased annually at the ungrazed site. A significantly greater cover (>85 %) occurred at plots where thick brash (>85 % ground cover) had been topped with GeoJute netting, but plots with only heather brash still reached 56.6 % cover. It provided a suitable seed source and colonising substrate for appropriate local peatbog species, while additional planting of C. vulgaris cuttings did not significantly increase vegetation cover in comparison to unplanted plots. These results show that short-term restoration of bare peat can be promoted using minimal interventions and onsite resources in the absence of grazing.","PeriodicalId":48721,"journal":{"name":"Mires and Peat","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mires and Peat","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19189/MAP.2019.AJB.STA.1902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Revegetation of eroded bare peat is commonly facilitated by the import of artificial resources and genetic material (lime, seed and fertiliser), but such techniques are less suitable for remote upland locations with sensitive local flora. Using a BACI (Before-After-Control-Impact) approach, this study explores the effectiveness of alternative treatments (heather (Calluna vulgaris) brash cut onsite and two types of geotextiles) in the following four years at grazed and ungrazed sites at Ben Lawers National Nature Reserve. After an initial colonisation, the mean vegetation cover in grazed plots degraded to 9.4 %, demonstrating that restoration using these methods is impeded by trampling impacts of large herbivores. The vegetation cover and number of indicator species increased annually at the ungrazed site. A significantly greater cover (>85 %) occurred at plots where thick brash (>85 % ground cover) had been topped with GeoJute netting, but plots with only heather brash still reached 56.6 % cover. It provided a suitable seed source and colonising substrate for appropriate local peatbog species, while additional planting of C. vulgaris cuttings did not significantly increase vegetation cover in comparison to unplanted plots. These results show that short-term restoration of bare peat can be promoted using minimal interventions and onsite resources in the absence of grazing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有无放牧的情况下,利用石南灌木和土工布对高地侵蚀的裸泥炭进行植被恢复
进口人工资源和遗传物质(石灰、种子和肥料)通常有助于侵蚀裸泥炭的恢复,但这些技术不太适合当地植物敏感的偏远高地地区。本研究采用BACI(前-后-控制-影响)方法,在接下来的四年中,在Ben Lawers国家自然保护区放牧和未放牧的地点,探讨了替代处理(石南花(Calluna vulgaris)现场切割和两种土工布)的有效性。在最初的殖民化之后,放牧地的平均植被覆盖率下降到9.4%,这表明使用这些方法的恢复受到大型食草动物践踏影响的阻碍。未放牧地植被覆盖度和指示物种数量呈逐年增加趋势。在地面覆盖度为> 85%的地面覆盖度的地块上,盖度显著提高(> 85%),而仅覆盖石南芥的地块盖度仍达到56.6%。它为当地适宜的泥炭物种提供了合适的种子来源和定殖基质,而与未种植的样地相比,额外种植柽柳插条并没有显著增加植被覆盖。这些结果表明,在没有放牧的情况下,使用最少的干预措施和现场资源可以促进裸泥炭的短期恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mires and Peat
Mires and Peat ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Mires and Peat is a peer-reviewed internet journal focusing specifically on mires, peatlands and peat. As a truly “free-to-users” publication (i.e. NO CHARGES to authors OR readers), it is immediately accessible to readers and potential authors worldwide. It is published jointly by the International Peatland Society (IPS) and the International Mire Conservation Group (IMCG). Mires and Peat is indexed by Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2017 Impact Factors: 1.326 [two-year] and 1.638 [five-year]), Elsevier Scopus, EBSCO Environment Complete, CABI Abstracts, CSA Proquest (including their Aquatic Science and Fisheries Abstracts ASFA, Ecology, Entomology, Animal Behavior, Aqualine and Pollution databases) and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Mires and Peat also participates in the CABI Full Text Repository, and subscribes to the Portico E-journal Preservation Service (LTPA). Mires and Peat publishes high-quality research papers on all aspects of peatland science, technology and wise use, including: ecology, hydrology, survey, inventory, classification, functions and values of mires and peatlands; scientific, economic and human aspects of the management of peatlands for agriculture, forestry, nature conservation, environmental protection, peat extraction, industrial development and other purposes; biological, physical and chemical characteristics of peat; and climate change and peatlands. Short communications and review articles on these and related topics will also be considered; and suggestions for special issues of the Journal based on the proceedings of conferences, seminars, symposia and workshops will be welcomed. The submission of material by authors and from countries whose work would otherwise be inaccessible to the international community is particularly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Towards net zero CO2 in 2050: an emission reduction pathway for organic soils in Germany Ecohydrological analysis of a South African through-flow mire: Vankervelsvlei revisited Soil CO2 emissions and net primary production of an oil palm plantation established on tropical peat Plant community assembly is predicted by an environmental gradient in high-altitude wetlands in the semiarid western bolivian andes Moth Responses to forest-to-bog restoration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1