Reliability of the Coach’s Eye Goniometer Application during Squat Exercise

Jonathan W Kilgallon, Joseph Cave, Emily J. Cushion, S. Joffe, J. Tallent
{"title":"Reliability of the Coach’s Eye Goniometer Application during Squat Exercise","authors":"Jonathan W Kilgallon, Joseph Cave, Emily J. Cushion, S. Joffe, J. Tallent","doi":"10.18276/cej.2022.2-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the test re-test, intrarater and interrater reliability of joint kinematics from the coach’s Eye smartphone application. Twenty-two males completed a 1-repetition maximum (1-rM) assessment followed by 2 identical sessions using 5 incremental loads (20, 40, 60, 80, 90% 1-rM). Peak flexion angles at the hip, knee, and ankle joints were assessed using 1 experienced practitioner and 1 inexperienced practitioner. the acceptable reliability thresholds were defined as intraclass correlation coefficient (Icc) r > 0.70 and coefficient of variation cv ≤ 10%. the test re-test reliability of peak hip and knee flexion were reliable across 20–90% 1-rM (r > 0.64; cv < 4.2%), whereas peak ankle flexion was not reliable at any loaded condition (r > 0.70; cv < 20.4%). no significant differences were detected between trials (p > 0.11). the intrarater reliability was near perfect (r > 0.90) except for peak ankle flexion (r > 0.85). the interrater reliability was nearly perfect (r > 0.91) except for hip flexion at 80% 1-rM and ankle flexion at 20% (r > 0.77). concludingly, the coach’s Eye application can produce repeatable assessments of joint kinematics using either a single examiner or 2 examiners, regardless of experience level. the coach’s Eye can accurately monitor squat depth. Participants were allowed to use their own lifting footwear.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18276/cej.2022.2-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the test re-test, intrarater and interrater reliability of joint kinematics from the coach’s Eye smartphone application. Twenty-two males completed a 1-repetition maximum (1-rM) assessment followed by 2 identical sessions using 5 incremental loads (20, 40, 60, 80, 90% 1-rM). Peak flexion angles at the hip, knee, and ankle joints were assessed using 1 experienced practitioner and 1 inexperienced practitioner. the acceptable reliability thresholds were defined as intraclass correlation coefficient (Icc) r > 0.70 and coefficient of variation cv ≤ 10%. the test re-test reliability of peak hip and knee flexion were reliable across 20–90% 1-rM (r > 0.64; cv < 4.2%), whereas peak ankle flexion was not reliable at any loaded condition (r > 0.70; cv < 20.4%). no significant differences were detected between trials (p > 0.11). the intrarater reliability was near perfect (r > 0.90) except for peak ankle flexion (r > 0.85). the interrater reliability was nearly perfect (r > 0.91) except for hip flexion at 80% 1-rM and ankle flexion at 20% (r > 0.77). concludingly, the coach’s Eye application can produce repeatable assessments of joint kinematics using either a single examiner or 2 examiners, regardless of experience level. the coach’s Eye can accurately monitor squat depth. Participants were allowed to use their own lifting footwear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深蹲训练中教练眼测角仪应用的可靠性
本研究检验了教练眼智能手机应用程序中关节运动学的测试再测试、测试内和测试间的可靠性。22名男性完成了1次最大重复(1-rM)评估,随后进行了2次相同的训练,使用5种增量负荷(20、40、60、80、90% 1-rM)。髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的峰值屈曲角度由1名经验丰富的医生和1名经验不足的医生评估。可接受信度阈值定义为类内相关系数(Icc) r > 0.70,变异系数cv≤10%。髋关节和膝关节屈曲峰值的重测信度在20-90%的1-rM范围内是可靠的(r = 0.64;CV < 4.2%),而峰值踝关节屈曲在任何负荷条件下都不可靠(r > 0.70;CV < 20.4%)。试验间无显著差异(p < 0.11)。除了峰值踝关节屈曲(r > 0.85)外,关节内可靠性接近完美(r > 0.90)。除了髋关节屈曲为80%的1-rM和踝关节屈曲为20%的1-rM (r > 0.77)外,交互信度几乎是完美的(r > 0.91)。总之,无论经验水平如何,教练员的Eye应用程序可以使用单个或2个检查人员对关节运动学进行可重复的评估。教练的眼睛可以准确监测深蹲的深度。参与者可以使用自己的升降鞋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physiological Approach to Cardio-endurance Training: Indicators of Optimal Parasympathetic Input on Cardiovascular Regulation are Better Predictors of Running Performance of Distance Runners Impact of Coaches’ Transformational Leadership on Soccer Players’ Satisfaction in Selected Ethiopian Super and National League Football Clubs Major International Competition Funding and Money Laundering Risks Starting and Specialisation Ages of Elite Athletes across Olympic Sports: An International Cross-sectional Study Effect of Different Foam Rolling Sensitivities on the Amount of Change in Range of Motion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1