Whose Administrative Law is it Anyway? How Global Norms Reshape the Administrative State

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS CORNELL INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL Pub Date : 2013-07-18 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2295550
D. Barak-Erez, Oren Perez
{"title":"Whose Administrative Law is it Anyway? How Global Norms Reshape the Administrative State","authors":"D. Barak-Erez, Oren Perez","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2295550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of global norms of administrative law reshapes the administrative state. In many areas, covering diverse topics such as trade, financial regulation, public health, and the environment, various international agencies have acquired increasing influence over domestic regulatory processes. The integration with the global arena requires the state to forgo some of its regulatory powers. This Article focuses on the normative challenges posed by this new reality. Part I explicates the way in which the argument presented differs from the global administrative law literature. Whereas global administrative law studies the meta-norms that regulate the activities of global administrative bodies, we focus on the way in which international norms reshape decision-making processes within domestic bureaucracies. This Article develops an analytical schema that captures the distinct impacts of global administrative law on the domestic level. This schema distinguishes between three forms of influence: the substitution of domestic administrative discretion by global standards, the emergence of universal standards of administrative due process, and the globally inspired transference of enforcement responsibilities. Part II maps the various mechanisms through which transnational regulatory processes intervene in the local realm, reshaping the contours of domestic administrative law. The Article takes a pluralistic approach by highlighting the diverse sources and paths through which global law influences the domestic realm. Thus we focus both on the influence of the WTO system, as reflected in the three recent rulings against the U.S. (the Tuna-Labeling, Clove-Cigarettes, and Country of Origin Labeling (“COOL”) Requirements cases) and on the influence of private transnational institutions such as the International Organization for Standardization, certification bodies such as Social Accountability International (“SAI”), and regulatory scientific institutions such as the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radia","PeriodicalId":45714,"journal":{"name":"CORNELL INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CORNELL INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2295550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The emergence of global norms of administrative law reshapes the administrative state. In many areas, covering diverse topics such as trade, financial regulation, public health, and the environment, various international agencies have acquired increasing influence over domestic regulatory processes. The integration with the global arena requires the state to forgo some of its regulatory powers. This Article focuses on the normative challenges posed by this new reality. Part I explicates the way in which the argument presented differs from the global administrative law literature. Whereas global administrative law studies the meta-norms that regulate the activities of global administrative bodies, we focus on the way in which international norms reshape decision-making processes within domestic bureaucracies. This Article develops an analytical schema that captures the distinct impacts of global administrative law on the domestic level. This schema distinguishes between three forms of influence: the substitution of domestic administrative discretion by global standards, the emergence of universal standards of administrative due process, and the globally inspired transference of enforcement responsibilities. Part II maps the various mechanisms through which transnational regulatory processes intervene in the local realm, reshaping the contours of domestic administrative law. The Article takes a pluralistic approach by highlighting the diverse sources and paths through which global law influences the domestic realm. Thus we focus both on the influence of the WTO system, as reflected in the three recent rulings against the U.S. (the Tuna-Labeling, Clove-Cigarettes, and Country of Origin Labeling (“COOL”) Requirements cases) and on the influence of private transnational institutions such as the International Organization for Standardization, certification bodies such as Social Accountability International (“SAI”), and regulatory scientific institutions such as the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
到底是谁的行政法?全球规范如何重塑行政国家
全球行政法规范的出现重塑了行政国家。在涉及贸易、金融监管、公共卫生和环境等不同主题的许多领域,各种国际机构对国内监管程序的影响力越来越大。与全球舞台的融合要求国家放弃一些监管权力。这篇文章的重点是这一新现实带来的规范挑战。第一部分阐述了本文所提出的论点与全球行政法文献的不同之处。全球行政法研究的是规范全球行政机构活动的元规范,而我们关注的是国际规范如何重塑国内官僚机构的决策过程。本文发展了一个分析图式,捕捉全球行政法对国内层面的不同影响。这一模式区分了三种形式的影响:以全球标准取代国内行政自由裁量权,出现了行政正当程序的普遍标准,以及受到全球启发的执法责任转移。第二部分描绘了跨国监管过程干预地方领域的各种机制,重塑了国内行政法的轮廓。该条采用多元化的方法,强调国际法影响国内领域的各种来源和途径。因此,我们既关注世贸组织体系的影响,正如最近对美国的三个裁决(金枪鱼标签,丁香香烟和原产国标签(“COOL”)要求案)所反映的那样,也关注私营跨国机构的影响,如国际标准化组织,认证机构,如社会责任国际(“SAI”),以及诸如国际非电离辐射委员会等监管科学机构
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1967, the Cornell International Law Journal is one of the oldest and most prominent international law journals in the country. Three times a year, the Journal publishes scholarship that reflects the sweeping changes that are taking place in public and private international law. Two of the issues feature articles by legal scholars, practitioners, and participants in international politics as well as student-written notes. The third issue is dedicated to publishing papers generated by the Journal"s annual Symposium, held every spring in Ithaca, New York.
期刊最新文献
Plotting the Next "Revolution" in Choice of Law: A Proposed Approach The Choice-of-Law Revolution in the United States: Notes on Rereading von Mehren Sustainable Finance & China's Green Credit Reforms: A Test Case for Bank Monitoring of Environmental Risk Objective or Perception-Based: A Debate on the Ideal Measure of Corruption Legalized rent-seeking: Eminent domain in Kazakhstan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1