A Comparison of Social (Weekend) Smokers, Regular (Daily) Smokers and a Never-Smoked Group Upon Everyday Prospective Memory

T. Heffernan, T. O’neill
{"title":"A Comparison of Social (Weekend) Smokers, Regular (Daily) Smokers and a Never-Smoked Group Upon Everyday Prospective Memory","authors":"T. Heffernan, T. O’neill","doi":"10.2174/1874941001104010072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our previous studies suggested that smokers have a worse performance on everyday prospective memory (PM) tasks than non-smokers. The present study compared regular and social smokers to see if there is a dose-response relationship between smoking and PM. We recruited 28 social (weekend) smokers (SS), 28 regular (daily) smokers (RS) and 28 people who had never smoked (NS) from among social science students who reported no psychiatric or drug and alcohol problems. The participant's PM was assessed by means of a Prospective Remembering Video Procedure (PRVP). After controlling for between-group variations in weekly (moderate) alcohol use, mood and IQ, the findings revealed that NS performed better than RS (F= 1.44, p<0.01) and SS (F= 1.70, p<0.01), with no significant difference between RS and SS (F= 1.00, p=.38).Smokers have a lower performance on our PM task than non-smokers, regardless of the type of smoking pattern.","PeriodicalId":89289,"journal":{"name":"The open addiction journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"72-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001104010072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Our previous studies suggested that smokers have a worse performance on everyday prospective memory (PM) tasks than non-smokers. The present study compared regular and social smokers to see if there is a dose-response relationship between smoking and PM. We recruited 28 social (weekend) smokers (SS), 28 regular (daily) smokers (RS) and 28 people who had never smoked (NS) from among social science students who reported no psychiatric or drug and alcohol problems. The participant's PM was assessed by means of a Prospective Remembering Video Procedure (PRVP). After controlling for between-group variations in weekly (moderate) alcohol use, mood and IQ, the findings revealed that NS performed better than RS (F= 1.44, p<0.01) and SS (F= 1.70, p<0.01), with no significant difference between RS and SS (F= 1.00, p=.38).Smokers have a lower performance on our PM task than non-smokers, regardless of the type of smoking pattern.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会(周末)吸烟者、常规(每日)吸烟者和从不吸烟者每日前瞻记忆的比较
我们之前的研究表明,吸烟者在日常前瞻性记忆(PM)任务中的表现比不吸烟者更差。目前的研究比较了常规吸烟者和社交吸烟者,以了解吸烟和PM之间是否存在剂量反应关系。我们招募了28名社会(周末)吸烟者(SS), 28名经常(RS)吸烟者(RS)和28名从不吸烟(NS)的社会科学学生,他们报告没有精神或药物和酒精问题。通过前瞻性记忆录像程序(PRVP)评估参与者的PM。在控制每周(中度)饮酒、情绪和智商的组间差异后,研究结果显示,NS组的表现优于RS组(F= 1.44, p<0.01)和SS组(F= 1.70, p<0.01), RS组与SS组之间无显著差异(F= 1.00, p= 0.38)。无论吸烟类型如何,吸烟者在PM任务中的表现都低于不吸烟者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective and Retrospective Memory Deficits Associated with Androgenic Anabolic Steroid Use The Absence of Blocking Innicotine High-Responders as a Possible Factor in the Development of Nicotine Dependence? Gauging Regional Differences in the HIV Prevalence Rate Among Injection Drug Users in the U.S. Cannabis use and disorder transitions among a mixed community sample of at-risk adolescents and adults: A prospective New Zealand study Extinction Learning as a Model of Drug Treatment and Relapse: A Behavioral Overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1