Digital acquisition: reflections on data quality

IF 0.4 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY Archeologia e Calcolatori Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.19282/AC.28.2.2017.41
A. Ippolito, M. Attenni, C. Bartolomei
{"title":"Digital acquisition: reflections on data quality","authors":"A. Ippolito, M. Attenni, C. Bartolomei","doi":"10.19282/AC.28.2.2017.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past twenty years archaeological survey has changed radically thanks to the progress in the field of technology, in particular concerning 3D massive acquisition methods. A variety of data acquisition modes, based on active and passive sensor systems, is increasingly easier to access and use to document cultural heritage. The scientific debate focuses primarily on two issues: the use of free or proprietary software, and the control over data quality, in terms of metric accuracy, by comparing 3D image-based acquisition methods with consolidated methods (laser scansion and/or topographic survey). Collecting, interpreting and filing a large amount of information helps to define a system we can use to understand our archaeological heritage. The system is based on the scientific process used to achieve a dual objective: first, to document acquisition using a heterogeneous set of data (x, y, z and RGB) and metadata (information processing) and guarantee repeatability; secondly, to ensure data quality during acquisition and processing. Data processing obtained using 3D massive acquisition methods makes it possible to build models characterized by a biunivocal correspondence to the real object, studied from a geometric and spatial point of view. The study focuses on the shift from quantitative data, acquired in a semi-automatic manner, to qualitative data, meticulously controlled as regards to uncertainty. In this framework, all branches of the Science of Representation ensure metric, spatial and formal control of the built models. The study of the 13th century Gates of the city of Bologna have so far led to the development of a scientific process providing important data about metric quality vis-a-vis, the scale of the model.","PeriodicalId":43161,"journal":{"name":"Archeologia e Calcolatori","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archeologia e Calcolatori","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19282/AC.28.2.2017.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past twenty years archaeological survey has changed radically thanks to the progress in the field of technology, in particular concerning 3D massive acquisition methods. A variety of data acquisition modes, based on active and passive sensor systems, is increasingly easier to access and use to document cultural heritage. The scientific debate focuses primarily on two issues: the use of free or proprietary software, and the control over data quality, in terms of metric accuracy, by comparing 3D image-based acquisition methods with consolidated methods (laser scansion and/or topographic survey). Collecting, interpreting and filing a large amount of information helps to define a system we can use to understand our archaeological heritage. The system is based on the scientific process used to achieve a dual objective: first, to document acquisition using a heterogeneous set of data (x, y, z and RGB) and metadata (information processing) and guarantee repeatability; secondly, to ensure data quality during acquisition and processing. Data processing obtained using 3D massive acquisition methods makes it possible to build models characterized by a biunivocal correspondence to the real object, studied from a geometric and spatial point of view. The study focuses on the shift from quantitative data, acquired in a semi-automatic manner, to qualitative data, meticulously controlled as regards to uncertainty. In this framework, all branches of the Science of Representation ensure metric, spatial and formal control of the built models. The study of the 13th century Gates of the city of Bologna have so far led to the development of a scientific process providing important data about metric quality vis-a-vis, the scale of the model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字采集:对数据质量的思考
在过去的二十年中,由于技术领域的进步,特别是在三维大规模采集方法方面,考古调查发生了根本性的变化。基于有源和无源传感器系统的各种数据采集模式越来越容易获取和用于记录文化遗产。科学辩论主要集中在两个问题上:免费或专有软件的使用,以及通过比较基于3D图像的获取方法与综合方法(激光扫描和/或地形测量)对数据质量的控制,即度量精度。收集、解释和归档大量信息有助于定义一个系统,我们可以用它来了解我们的考古遗产。该系统基于科学的过程,用于实现双重目标:第一,使用异构数据集(x, y, z和RGB)和元数据(信息处理)进行文档采集,并保证可重复性;其次,在采集和处理过程中保证数据质量。利用三维大规模采集方法获得的数据处理,可以从几何和空间的角度研究,建立与真实物体具有双重对应特征的模型。该研究侧重于从以半自动方式获得的定量数据到精心控制不确定性的定性数据的转变。在这个框架中,表示科学的所有分支确保了对所建模型的度量、空间和形式控制。到目前为止,对13世纪博洛尼亚城门的研究已经导致了一种科学过程的发展,提供了关于公制质量的重要数据,即模型的规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: From the outset, the aim was to initiate an open and continuous exchange of information among different countries, thus prompting the creation of an international Scientific Committee. Representatives of the major Italian and foreign institutes interested in archaeological computing agreed to become members. A qualified Editorial board also assures a continuous flow of information and a profitable exchange of data. The journal covers three distinct parts. The first considers methodological approaches: it collects articles concerning theoretical aspects of archaeological computing as well as reports on programmes conducted by dedicated international institutions. The main section contains articles on various computer applications, such as databases, Geographical Information Systems, quantitative methods, expert systems, computer graphics, image processing, multimedia and web tools. A section is also dedicated to the automatic processing of documentary sources. The third aspect of the journal is characterised by book reviews and bibliographic news, with the aim to provide readers with an up-to-date source of documentation. Special thematic issues and Conference Proceedings have also been included.
期刊最新文献
SfM-photogrammetry for fast recording of archaeological features in remote areas Adulis (Eritrea): criticità e peculiarità di un sito complesso nel Corno d’Africa L’architetto, l’archeologo e Nostradamus Il recupero del genius loci del sito archeologico di Ghoufi (Aurès, Wilaya de Batna, Algeria) From databases to archaeological online resources: the logic of object classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1