Weissman v. National Association of Securities Dealers: A Dangerously Narrow Interpretation of Absolute Immunity for Self-Regulatory Organizations

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Cornell Law Review Pub Date : 2008-07-18 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1162942
Andrew J. Cavo
{"title":"Weissman v. National Association of Securities Dealers: A Dangerously Narrow Interpretation of Absolute Immunity for Self-Regulatory Organizations","authors":"Andrew J. Cavo","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1162942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Weissman v. National Association of Securities Dealers, the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the doctrine of absolute immunity for Self-regulatory organizations in a way that may make it possible for private investors to recover from the stock exchanges themselves for investments gone awry.","PeriodicalId":51518,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Law Review","volume":"94 1","pages":"415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1162942","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Weissman v. National Association of Securities Dealers, the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the doctrine of absolute immunity for Self-regulatory organizations in a way that may make it possible for private investors to recover from the stock exchanges themselves for investments gone awry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
魏斯曼诉全国证券交易商协会:对自我监管组织绝对豁免权的危险狭隘解释
在韦斯曼诉全国证券交易商协会案中,第十一巡回法院缩小了自我监管组织的绝对豁免原则,使私人投资者有可能从证券交易所获得投资失误的赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1915, the Cornell Law Review is a student-run and student-edited journal that strives to publish novel scholarship that will have an immediate and lasting impact on the legal community. The Cornell Law Review publishes six issues annually consisting of articles, essays, book reviews, and student notes.
期刊最新文献
The Health Security Act: coercion and distrust for the market. Laws Intentionally Favoring Mainstream Religions: An Unhelpful Comparison to Race The Role of History in Constitutional Interpretation: A Case Study Making state civil procedure Stricken: the Need for Positive Statutory Law to Prevent Discriminatory Peremptory Strikes of Disabled Jurors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1