{"title":"Accounting In Malaysia In The Post-New Economic Policy (NEP) Era","authors":"Azham Md. Ali","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V1I1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the economic recession in 1985-86 but prior to the Asian Financial Crisis in the thirdquarter 1997, accounting in Malaysia appeared to have been energised with major amendmentsof the Companies Act 1965, activation of the statutory accounting body Malaysian Institute ofAccountants (MIA) and talks over the setting up the Malaysian Accounting Standards Board(MASB). This study attempts to find out the reality of these changes and the reasons behindthis reality. By applying the political economic approach to accounting (Cooper & Sherer,1984) and with data obtained from primary and secondary source documentation and in-depthinterviews, it is found that superficial accounting changes had taken place: Companies Actamendment on additional auditor reporting duty was lacking in enforcement, the revived MIAacted inadequately as accounting regulator; and, the MASB was established with no enforcementcapability. These changes were consistent with and stemmed from Malaysia's social, economicand political attributes which were supported by the elite class.  Copyright © www.iiste.org","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"96 1","pages":"109-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V1I1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
后新经济政策时代的马来西亚会计
在1985-86年的经济衰退之后,但在1997年第三季度的亚洲金融危机之前,马来西亚的会计似乎已经充满活力,1965年公司法的重大修订,法定会计机构马来西亚会计师协会(MIA)的激活以及关于建立马来西亚会计准则委员会(MASB)的谈判。本研究试图找出这些变化的现实及其背后的原因。通过将政治经济学方法应用于会计(Cooper & Sherer,1984),并通过从第一手和第二手源文件和深入访谈中获得的数据,发现发生了表面的会计变化:公司法修正案关于额外审计报告责任缺乏执行,重新启动的mias作为会计监管机构的作用不充分;而且,MASB的成立没有执法能力。这些变化符合并源于马来西亚的社会、经济和政治属性,这些属性得到了精英阶层的支持。Â版权所有©www.iiste.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。