Sin is a Person: Some Ontological Metaphors in the Bible

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION Acta Theologica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.18820/23099089/actat.v41i1.6
C. Owiredu
{"title":"Sin is a Person: Some Ontological Metaphors in the Bible","authors":"C. Owiredu","doi":"10.18820/23099089/actat.v41i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the ontological metaphors relating to the personification of sin in the Bible. It aims to explore the metaphorical conceptualisation of sin as a person, as suggested in the sin expressions. Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) Conceptual Metaphor Theory is used in analysing the data. The findings of the study indicate that sin is conceptualised as king, master, lord, paymaster, mother, and child. The use of these conceptual metaphors indicates that the writers of the selected biblical texts intended to project a deeper meaning of sin beyond the literal meaning of sin in daily language. The ontological metaphorical use of sin in the Bible seems to give a greater effect in comprehension to the reader of the texts.","PeriodicalId":39489,"journal":{"name":"Acta Theologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Theologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/23099089/actat.v41i1.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article discusses the ontological metaphors relating to the personification of sin in the Bible. It aims to explore the metaphorical conceptualisation of sin as a person, as suggested in the sin expressions. Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) Conceptual Metaphor Theory is used in analysing the data. The findings of the study indicate that sin is conceptualised as king, master, lord, paymaster, mother, and child. The use of these conceptual metaphors indicates that the writers of the selected biblical texts intended to project a deeper meaning of sin beyond the literal meaning of sin in daily language. The ontological metaphorical use of sin in the Bible seems to give a greater effect in comprehension to the reader of the texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罪是一个人:圣经中的一些本体论隐喻
本文讨论了圣经中与罪的人格化有关的本体论隐喻。它的目的是探索隐喻概念化的罪作为一个人,如建议在罪恶的表达。数据分析采用Lakoff和Johnson(1980)的概念隐喻理论。研究结果表明,罪被概念化为国王、主人、领主、出纳员、母亲和孩子。这些概念隐喻的使用表明,所选圣经文本的作者意图在日常语言中罪恶的字面意义之外,投射出更深层次的罪恶含义。圣经中对罪的本体论隐喻的使用似乎对文本的读者的理解有更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Theologica
Acta Theologica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Theologica is the official and accredited theological journal of the Faculty of Theology of the University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
期刊最新文献
Resilient religion: What good is religion for? Faith formation in the tension interplay of tools, processes and the course for social transformation Shall we dance? Choreographing hospitality as key to interpersonal transformation Have we lost touch with the Prophet Amos's warning? Church leaders and blood money rituals among youths in Nigeria A post-colonial political theology of care and praxis in Ethiopia’s era of identity politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1