Enabling Cross-discipline Collaboration and Forward Modeling through Advanced Subsurface Geocellular Earth Modeling

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.2113/GSCPGBULL.63.4.393
R. Dusterhoft, S. Siddiqui, C. Davila
{"title":"Enabling Cross-discipline Collaboration and Forward Modeling through Advanced Subsurface Geocellular Earth Modeling","authors":"R. Dusterhoft, S. Siddiqui, C. Davila","doi":"10.2113/GSCPGBULL.63.4.393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In many situations, our industry today has become very focused on managing huge quantities of data, looking for simple correlations that would enable them to capture useful information applicable to asset planning and field development. One of the key issues with this approach is that it is always looking backward to determine the path forward. By nature, this process is reactionary, making it difficult to identify opportunities for real innovation. Having assessed the industry position, a new approach was examined where data and information could be continuously fed into an evolving sub-surface geocellular earth modeling tool. This would represent a significant change from the traditional modeling tools where changes are limited due to the time and effort required to collect and process new information, then work through the entire modeling process. This new approach requires a geocellular earth model that is capable of receiving new information continuously and updating quickly. Forward modeling in this way provides a single environment where geoscientists and engineers can work together to improve their understanding of the reservoir, leverage the latest generation of tools to model cause and effect behaviors, and quickly establish optimized field development solutions. Statistical tools are still very useful for monitoring performance, but this data is also used to calibrate design tools to enable continuous refinement to the subsurface geocellular model and forward modeling tools. By accomplishing this, a common collaboration environment is created where both geoscientists and engineers can collaborate and work with the most current and most relevant subsurface information and knowledge. This concept has been tested in a number of proof-of-concept projects that have shown very promising results, one of which is discussed in detail in this paper.","PeriodicalId":56325,"journal":{"name":"Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology","volume":"63 1","pages":"393-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2113/GSCPGBULL.63.4.393","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/GSCPGBULL.63.4.393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In many situations, our industry today has become very focused on managing huge quantities of data, looking for simple correlations that would enable them to capture useful information applicable to asset planning and field development. One of the key issues with this approach is that it is always looking backward to determine the path forward. By nature, this process is reactionary, making it difficult to identify opportunities for real innovation. Having assessed the industry position, a new approach was examined where data and information could be continuously fed into an evolving sub-surface geocellular earth modeling tool. This would represent a significant change from the traditional modeling tools where changes are limited due to the time and effort required to collect and process new information, then work through the entire modeling process. This new approach requires a geocellular earth model that is capable of receiving new information continuously and updating quickly. Forward modeling in this way provides a single environment where geoscientists and engineers can work together to improve their understanding of the reservoir, leverage the latest generation of tools to model cause and effect behaviors, and quickly establish optimized field development solutions. Statistical tools are still very useful for monitoring performance, but this data is also used to calibrate design tools to enable continuous refinement to the subsurface geocellular model and forward modeling tools. By accomplishing this, a common collaboration environment is created where both geoscientists and engineers can collaborate and work with the most current and most relevant subsurface information and knowledge. This concept has been tested in a number of proof-of-concept projects that have shown very promising results, one of which is discussed in detail in this paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过先进的地下地球细胞地球建模实现跨学科协作和正演建模
在许多情况下,我们的行业已经变得非常专注于管理大量数据,寻找简单的相关性,使他们能够捕获适用于资产规划和油田开发的有用信息。这种方法的一个关键问题是,它总是向后看,以确定前进的道路。从本质上讲,这个过程是反动的,很难发现真正创新的机会。在评估了行业地位之后,研究人员研究了一种新的方法,可以将数据和信息持续输入到不断发展的地下地球细胞地球建模工具中。这将代表传统建模工具的重大变化,传统建模工具由于收集和处理新信息所需的时间和精力而受到限制,然后通过整个建模过程进行工作。这种新方法需要一种能够连续接收新信息并快速更新的地球元胞模型。正演建模提供了一个单一的环境,地球科学家和工程师可以一起工作,提高他们对储层的理解,利用最新一代的工具来模拟因果关系,并快速建立优化的油田开发解决方案。统计工具对于监测性能仍然非常有用,但这些数据也用于校准设计工具,以便对地下geocellular模型和正演建模工具进行持续改进。通过实现这一目标,创建了一个共同的协作环境,地球科学家和工程师可以利用最新和最相关的地下信息和知识进行协作和工作。这个概念已经在许多概念验证项目中进行了测试,并显示出非常有希望的结果,本文详细讨论了其中一个项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology
Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geochemistry and Petrology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published four times a year. Founded in 1953, the BCPG aims to be the journal of record for papers dealing with all aspects of petroleum geology, broadly conceived, with a particularly (though not exclusively) Canadian focus. International submissions are encouraged, especially where a connection can be made to Canadian examples.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of the Liquid CO2 Washing with Conventional Wash on Firefighters' Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Comparison of the contralateral oblique view with the lateral view for mid-thoracic epidural access under fluoroscopic guidance: a randomized controlled trial. Lithostratigraphic revision and biostratigraphy of Upper Hauterivian–Barremian strata from the Kugmallit Trough, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories Upper Elk Point subgroup paleogeography and evaporite distribution with implications for evaporite dissolution, karstification, and carbonate diagenesis in northeastern Alberta The type section of the Canol Formation (Devonian black shale) at Powell Creek: Critical assessment and correlation in the northern Cordillera, NWT, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1