Comparative Analysis of the Liquid CO2 Washing with Conventional Wash on Firefighters' Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-25 DOI:10.3390/textiles2040036
Arjunsing Girase, Donald Thompson, Robert Bryan Ormond
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Liquid CO<sub>2</sub> Washing with Conventional Wash on Firefighters' Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).","authors":"Arjunsing Girase, Donald Thompson, Robert Bryan Ormond","doi":"10.3390/textiles2040036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Firefighters are exposed to several potentially carcinogenic fireground contaminants. The current NFPA 1851 washing procedures are less effective in cleaning due to the limited intensity of the washing conditions that are used. The 2020 edition of NFPA 1851 has added limited specialized cleaning for higher efficacy. The liquid carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) laundering technique has gained popularity in recent years due to its availability to remove contaminants and its eco-friendliness. The primary aim of this study is to address the firefighter questions regarding the efficacy of cleaning with liquid CO<sub>2</sub> and to compare it with the conventional washing technique. The unused turnout jackets were contaminated with a mixture of fireground contaminants. These turnout jackets were cleaned with conventional NFPA 1851-appoved aqueous washing and a commercially available liquid CO<sub>2</sub> method. Post-cleaning samples were analyzed for contamination using pressurized solvent extraction and GC-MS. The liquid CO<sub>2</sub> technique demonstrated considerable improvement in washing efficiency compared to the conventional washing.</p>","PeriodicalId":56325,"journal":{"name":"Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology","volume":"63 1","pages":"624-632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698642/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2040036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Firefighters are exposed to several potentially carcinogenic fireground contaminants. The current NFPA 1851 washing procedures are less effective in cleaning due to the limited intensity of the washing conditions that are used. The 2020 edition of NFPA 1851 has added limited specialized cleaning for higher efficacy. The liquid carbon dioxide (CO2) laundering technique has gained popularity in recent years due to its availability to remove contaminants and its eco-friendliness. The primary aim of this study is to address the firefighter questions regarding the efficacy of cleaning with liquid CO2 and to compare it with the conventional washing technique. The unused turnout jackets were contaminated with a mixture of fireground contaminants. These turnout jackets were cleaned with conventional NFPA 1851-appoved aqueous washing and a commercially available liquid CO2 method. Post-cleaning samples were analyzed for contamination using pressurized solvent extraction and GC-MS. The liquid CO2 technique demonstrated considerable improvement in washing efficiency compared to the conventional washing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化碳液体清洗与传统清洗对消防员个人防护装备(PPE)的比较分析。
消防员会接触到多种可能致癌的火场污染物。现行的 NFPA 1851 清洗程序由于使用的清洗条件强度有限,清洗效果较差。2020 年版的 NFPA 1851 增加了有限的专业清洗,以提高清洗效果。近年来,液态二氧化碳(CO2)清洗技术因其可去除污染物和环保性而广受欢迎。本研究的主要目的是解决消防员对液态二氧化碳清洗效果的疑问,并将其与传统清洗技术进行比较。未使用的消防外衣受到火场污染物混合物的污染。这些道岔夹克采用 NFPA 1851 规定的传统水洗方法和市售液态二氧化碳方法进行清洗。采用加压溶剂萃取和气相色谱-质谱法对清洗后的样品进行了污染分析。与传统清洗方法相比,液态 CO2 技术大大提高了清洗效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology
Bullentin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geochemistry and Petrology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published four times a year. Founded in 1953, the BCPG aims to be the journal of record for papers dealing with all aspects of petroleum geology, broadly conceived, with a particularly (though not exclusively) Canadian focus. International submissions are encouraged, especially where a connection can be made to Canadian examples.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of the Liquid CO2 Washing with Conventional Wash on Firefighters' Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Comparison of the contralateral oblique view with the lateral view for mid-thoracic epidural access under fluoroscopic guidance: a randomized controlled trial. Lithostratigraphic revision and biostratigraphy of Upper Hauterivian–Barremian strata from the Kugmallit Trough, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories Upper Elk Point subgroup paleogeography and evaporite distribution with implications for evaporite dissolution, karstification, and carbonate diagenesis in northeastern Alberta The type section of the Canol Formation (Devonian black shale) at Powell Creek: Critical assessment and correlation in the northern Cordillera, NWT, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1