Predição do Risco de Reprovação no Ensino Superior Usando Algoritmos de Machine Le-arning

A. Silva, Aléssio Tony Cavalcanti Almeida, Hilton Martins de Brito Ramalho
{"title":"Predição do Risco de Reprovação no Ensino Superior Usando Algoritmos de Machine Le-arning","authors":"A. Silva, Aléssio Tony Cavalcanti Almeida, Hilton Martins de Brito Ramalho","doi":"10.21714/2238-104x2020v10i2-51124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"65% Esses ratificam que algoritmos de ML podem ser instrumentos viáveis para auxiliar e gerenciais acadêmicas preventivas índices reprovações superior. Palavras-chave: Predição de Risco. Reprovação. Ensino Superior. Machine Learning . ABSTRACT This research proposes to identify the risk of failing higher education students using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. Based on the administrative records of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) and Plataforma Lattes, for the period 2010-2016 of the discipline of differential and integral calculus I, it was verified that the models with the best forecasting performance were Ridge, Logistic Regression, LASSO and Elastic Net, with no statistical differences in performance between them. From the modeling on the training data, the results found explain that, of the 1,903 observations that make up a new data set, the test set, the frequency of students with status (failed and approved) correctly predicted by Accuracy was 69 %, on both models. In turn, 72% of students were correctly predicted as failing (Sensitivity). These findings confirm that ML algorithms can be viable instruments to assist preventive academic management and pedagogical actions aimed at reducing failure rates in higher education.","PeriodicalId":41134,"journal":{"name":"Teoria e Pratica em Administracao-TPA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21714/2238-104x2020v10i2-51124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria e Pratica em Administracao-TPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21714/2238-104x2020v10i2-51124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

65% Esses ratificam que algoritmos de ML podem ser instrumentos viáveis para auxiliar e gerenciais acadêmicas preventivas índices reprovações superior. Palavras-chave: Predição de Risco. Reprovação. Ensino Superior. Machine Learning . ABSTRACT This research proposes to identify the risk of failing higher education students using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. Based on the administrative records of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) and Plataforma Lattes, for the period 2010-2016 of the discipline of differential and integral calculus I, it was verified that the models with the best forecasting performance were Ridge, Logistic Regression, LASSO and Elastic Net, with no statistical differences in performance between them. From the modeling on the training data, the results found explain that, of the 1,903 observations that make up a new data set, the test set, the frequency of students with status (failed and approved) correctly predicted by Accuracy was 69 %, on both models. In turn, 72% of students were correctly predicted as failing (Sensitivity). These findings confirm that ML algorithms can be viable instruments to assist preventive academic management and pedagogical actions aimed at reducing failure rates in higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用Le-arning机器算法预测高等教育失败风险
65%的人同意使用机器学习辅助工具的算法viáveis辅助工具,acadêmicas预防工具índices reprovações优越。palavras - have: predidir - o de Risco。Reprovacao。教学优势。机器学习。本研究提出使用机器学习(ML)算法来识别高等教育学生不及格的风险。基于universsidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)和platforma latte在2010-2016年期间的微分与积分学I学科的管理记录,验证了预测效果最好的模型是Ridge、Logistic回归、LASSO和Elastic Net,它们之间的表现没有统计学差异。通过对训练数据的建模,结果发现,在组成新数据集(测试集)的1903个观察值中,准确率正确预测的状态(不及格和合格)的学生的频率在两个模型上都是69%。反过来,72%的学生被正确预测为不及格(敏感性)。这些发现证实,机器学习算法可以成为帮助预防性学术管理和旨在降低高等教育不良率的教学行动的可行工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Work passion e carreira proteana Dinâmica da inovação na estratégia da saúde da família Práticas de mensuração e gestão de custos Avaliação da produtividade do centro cirúrgico de um hospital universitário sob a ótica do Lean Healthcare Estilos de aprendizagem de médicos residentes de dois hospitais de Porto Alegre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1