Assessment of biosecurity measures implemented on the broiler farms in the region of Belgrade city

Q3 Veterinary Veterinarski Glasnik Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2298/vetgl230403003m
J. Maletić, L. Spalević, V. Milićević, D. Glišić, B. Kureljušić, J. Kureljusic, Milan Maletic
{"title":"Assessment of biosecurity measures implemented on the broiler farms in the region of Belgrade city","authors":"J. Maletić, L. Spalević, V. Milićević, D. Glišić, B. Kureljušić, J. Kureljusic, Milan Maletic","doi":"10.2298/vetgl230403003m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of biosecurity measures as the first line of defense is an essential prerequisite for preventing the occurrence and spread of infectious agents in flocks. Assessment of biosecurity measures on the farms was carried out during farm visits based on the application of an appropriate questionnaire whereby the farmer answered a number of questions regarding the implemented biosecurity measures. The study was performed via Biocheck.UGent online survey on 16 broiler farms in the region of the city of Belgrade. The capacity of farms was 25,000-100,000 broilers, placed in 2-4 houses, depending on the farm. Farm visits were made by the authors to confirm the correct answers to the online survey. Results showed that external biosecurity scores ranged from 57% to 93%, averaging 83.6%. Internal biosecurity score ranged from 48% to 98%, with an average score of 85.7%. The total score for the biosecurity assessment ranged from 56% to 93%, with an average score of 84.3%. The scores for subcategories varied between the farms. Removing manure and carcasses, a subcategory within the category of external biosecurity, had the lowest mean score (farms 9 and 10 had a score of 12%). Relatively low scores were also obtained for the number of steps of broilers depopulation (farm 9 had a score of 44%) and for the location of the farm (farms 2 and 3 had a score of 44%). Concerning internal biosecurity, the lowest score was obtained for the subcategory material and measures that they apply between compartments (farm 10 had a score of 29%). These findings should be useful for decision-makers and flock veterinarians and farmers to set feasible targets and sustainable biosecurity programs to improve biosecurity, the health status of the flock, and farm profitability.","PeriodicalId":30435,"journal":{"name":"Veterinarski Glasnik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinarski Glasnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/vetgl230403003m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of biosecurity measures as the first line of defense is an essential prerequisite for preventing the occurrence and spread of infectious agents in flocks. Assessment of biosecurity measures on the farms was carried out during farm visits based on the application of an appropriate questionnaire whereby the farmer answered a number of questions regarding the implemented biosecurity measures. The study was performed via Biocheck.UGent online survey on 16 broiler farms in the region of the city of Belgrade. The capacity of farms was 25,000-100,000 broilers, placed in 2-4 houses, depending on the farm. Farm visits were made by the authors to confirm the correct answers to the online survey. Results showed that external biosecurity scores ranged from 57% to 93%, averaging 83.6%. Internal biosecurity score ranged from 48% to 98%, with an average score of 85.7%. The total score for the biosecurity assessment ranged from 56% to 93%, with an average score of 84.3%. The scores for subcategories varied between the farms. Removing manure and carcasses, a subcategory within the category of external biosecurity, had the lowest mean score (farms 9 and 10 had a score of 12%). Relatively low scores were also obtained for the number of steps of broilers depopulation (farm 9 had a score of 44%) and for the location of the farm (farms 2 and 3 had a score of 44%). Concerning internal biosecurity, the lowest score was obtained for the subcategory material and measures that they apply between compartments (farm 10 had a score of 29%). These findings should be useful for decision-makers and flock veterinarians and farmers to set feasible targets and sustainable biosecurity programs to improve biosecurity, the health status of the flock, and farm profitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对贝尔格莱德地区肉鸡养殖场实施的生物安全措施进行评估
实施作为第一道防线的生物安全措施是防止感染原在禽群中发生和传播的必要先决条件。在农场访问期间,对农场的生物安全措施进行了评估,根据适当的问卷调查,农民回答了一些关于实施生物安全措施的问题。该研究通过Biocheck进行。对贝尔格莱德地区16个肉鸡养殖场进行了在线调查。农场的容量为25,000-100,000只肉鸡,根据农场的情况,放置在2-4个鸡舍中。作者访问了农场,以确认在线调查的正确答案。结果:外部生物安全评分范围为57% ~ 93%,平均83.6%;内部生物安全得分范围为48% ~ 98%,平均得分为85.7%。生物安全评价总分为56% ~ 93%,平均得分为84.3%。各个农场的子类别得分各不相同。去除粪便和尸体是外部生物安全类别中的一个子类,平均得分最低(农场9和10的得分为12%)。肉鸡种群减少的步骤数(9号农场得分为44%)和农场位置(2号和3号农场得分为44%)得分也相对较低。在内部生物安全方面,他们在隔间之间应用的材料和措施的子类别得分最低(10号农场得分为29%)。这些发现将有助于决策者和畜群兽医和养殖户制定可行的目标和可持续的生物安全计划,以提高生物安全、畜群健康状况和农场盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinarski Glasnik
Veterinarski Glasnik Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Molecular evidence of Theileria orientalis infection in cattle from Bosnia and Herzegovina Dacryocystography in rabbits Assessment of biosecurity measures implemented on the broiler farms in the region of Belgrade city Overview of non-invasive sampling methods used in intensive swine farming Serological profile and pleurisy lesions associated with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in pig farms in North Macedonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1