The Direct Action Institute for Possession Defense in the Portuguese Civil Code: some notes

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Revista de la Facultad de Derecho Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.22187/RFD2020N48A3
J. Bonito
{"title":"The Direct Action Institute for Possession Defense in the Portuguese Civil Code: some notes","authors":"J. Bonito","doi":"10.22187/RFD2020N48A3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The institute of direct action in the possession defense is provided for in article 1277 of the Portuguese Civil Code. It is legitimate to resort to direct action when there is a danger of practically invalidating a subjective right. The aim of this paper is to discuss the assumptions and conditions for direct action to occur. The elaboration was based on a revisit of the Roman Private Law, the Ordinances and the various Political Constitutions until the present Civil Code. The institute is discussed on the basis of a systematic review of national doctrine and under the jurisprudence eyes. It is structured in three parts: 1. The direct action; 2. The assumptions of direct action; 3. The effects of direct action. It follows that this institute is an exceptional case in which the State places certain coercive powers in the hands of privates, to ensure the realization of a right protected by law in other ways, when they are generally conferred only on public authorities. The legislator defined a set of assumptions (art. 336 of CC) for the exercise of this institute, stating that all must be guaranteed. In the mistaken assumption that they occur , the action gives rise to compensation for the damage caused.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2020N48A3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The institute of direct action in the possession defense is provided for in article 1277 of the Portuguese Civil Code. It is legitimate to resort to direct action when there is a danger of practically invalidating a subjective right. The aim of this paper is to discuss the assumptions and conditions for direct action to occur. The elaboration was based on a revisit of the Roman Private Law, the Ordinances and the various Political Constitutions until the present Civil Code. The institute is discussed on the basis of a systematic review of national doctrine and under the jurisprudence eyes. It is structured in three parts: 1. The direct action; 2. The assumptions of direct action; 3. The effects of direct action. It follows that this institute is an exceptional case in which the State places certain coercive powers in the hands of privates, to ensure the realization of a right protected by law in other ways, when they are generally conferred only on public authorities. The legislator defined a set of assumptions (art. 336 of CC) for the exercise of this institute, stating that all must be guaranteed. In the mistaken assumption that they occur , the action gives rise to compensation for the damage caused.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙民法典中占有抗辩的直接诉讼制度:若干注释
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Acceso de la Administración Tributaria a la Información Bancaria en Honduras Estudio de la Figura del Holding, su desarrollo en Latinoamérica y presencia en Honduras Reflexiones en torno a la Proporcionalidad y Ponderación de Derechos Aplicados al Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación In Vitro) Vs. Costa Rica Derechos Humanos: Coercibilidad de tratados, Educación, Estado de Derecho y Democracia RETROACTIVIDAD DE LA LEY PENAL MAS FAVORABLE (En Honduras una cuestión de justicia constitucional)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1