Review of the monograph: Volgina, N.A., Liu, Pengfei (2023). China in Global Value Chains. Moscow: KNORUS publ., 174 p.

P. Orekhovsky
{"title":"Review of the monograph: Volgina, N.A., Liu, Pengfei (2023). China in Global Value Chains. Moscow: KNORUS publ., 174 p.","authors":"P. Orekhovsky","doi":"10.22363/2313-2329-2023-31-1-184-189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review is devoted to the assessment of the monograph by N.A. Volgina and Liu Pengfei “China in Global Value Chains”. Based on the input-output methodological approach and the principle of decomposition of gross exports, the authors come to a number of relevant conclusions that depict the dynamics of China’s participation in global value chains. Thus, the last decades have been characterized by uneven growth of Chinese domestic and foreign value added: domestic value added has grown at a faster rate than foreign value added, and its share in gross exports has gradually increased. At the same time, there has been a drop in China’s “participation index” in global value chains, and this decrease was developing at the expense of a decrease in upward participation. The “position Index” was characterized by a different trend: its slow growth from negative to positive values was observed, which reflected the fact that China’s income from value-added trade was increasing. The authors’ calculations show that there are differences in the dynamics of “indices of participation” of individual industries in value chains: the share of labourintensive industries is decreasing and the share of capital-intensive industries, primarily engineering, is increasing. For the first time in Russian economic literature, this monograph critically assesses the contribution of Chinese economists to the study of the formation of global and regional value chains in China. In the final part of the monograph, the authors point out the contradictory effects of China’s participation in global value chains, which include both the benefits and risks of such integration.","PeriodicalId":53005,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2023-31-1-184-189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The review is devoted to the assessment of the monograph by N.A. Volgina and Liu Pengfei “China in Global Value Chains”. Based on the input-output methodological approach and the principle of decomposition of gross exports, the authors come to a number of relevant conclusions that depict the dynamics of China’s participation in global value chains. Thus, the last decades have been characterized by uneven growth of Chinese domestic and foreign value added: domestic value added has grown at a faster rate than foreign value added, and its share in gross exports has gradually increased. At the same time, there has been a drop in China’s “participation index” in global value chains, and this decrease was developing at the expense of a decrease in upward participation. The “position Index” was characterized by a different trend: its slow growth from negative to positive values was observed, which reflected the fact that China’s income from value-added trade was increasing. The authors’ calculations show that there are differences in the dynamics of “indices of participation” of individual industries in value chains: the share of labourintensive industries is decreasing and the share of capital-intensive industries, primarily engineering, is increasing. For the first time in Russian economic literature, this monograph critically assesses the contribution of Chinese economists to the study of the formation of global and regional value chains in China. In the final part of the monograph, the authors point out the contradictory effects of China’s participation in global value chains, which include both the benefits and risks of such integration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专著综述:Volgina, N.A,刘鹏飞(2023)。全球价值链中的中国。莫斯科:knous public。, 174页。
本文旨在对na . a . Volgina和刘鹏飞的专著《全球价值链中的中国》进行评价。基于投入产出方法和出口总额分解原则,作者得出了一些相关结论,这些结论描绘了中国参与全球价值链的动态。因此,过去几十年的特点是中国国内和国外增加值增长不平衡:国内增加值的增长速度快于国外增加值,其在出口总额中的份额逐渐增加。与此同时,中国在全球价值链中的“参与指数”有所下降,而这种下降是以向上参与的减少为代价的。而“头寸指数”则呈现出不同的趋势,由负向正缓慢增长,反映了中国增值贸易收入的增加。作者的计算表明,各个产业在价值链中的“参与指数”的动态存在差异:劳动密集型产业的份额正在下降,而资本密集型产业(主要是工程)的份额正在上升。在俄罗斯经济文献中,这本专著首次批判性地评估了中国经济学家对中国全球和区域价值链形成研究的贡献。在专著的最后一部分,作者指出了中国参与全球价值链的矛盾影响,包括这种整合的好处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
China’s arms trade: trends and challenges Central bank digital currencies: Digital Yuan and its role in Chinese digital economy development Development of a methodology for assessing the investment attractiveness of regional economic entities of the electrotechnical cluster The artificial intelligence: Prospects for development and problems of humanization Review of the monograph: Volgina, N.A., Liu, Pengfei (2023). China in Global Value Chains. Moscow: KNORUS publ., 174 p.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1