The $1.5 Billion General Motors Recalls at the Dangerous Intersection of Chapter 11, Article 9, and TARP

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW University of Cincinnati Law Review Pub Date : 2016-03-26 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2755003
S. Henry
{"title":"The $1.5 Billion General Motors Recalls at the Dangerous Intersection of Chapter 11, Article 9, and TARP","authors":"S. Henry","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2755003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard practice in many mega-Chapter 11 cases is to repay secured lenders at the outset of the case with the caveat that, if the repayment was inappropriate, the secured lenders will disgorge the payments. In the General Motors Chapter 11 case, a syndicate of lenders, mostly CLOs and various funds, were paid $1.5 billion at the outset of the case, even though their key financing statement had been accidentally terminated and thus they had no right to be paid. For almost seven years, the General Motors bankruptcy estate has been attempting -- at great cost -- to recover the money, and it seems unlikely that a material amount of the money will be recovered. This article explains why certain of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure need to be amended to prevent similar problems in the future.","PeriodicalId":45537,"journal":{"name":"University of Cincinnati Law Review","volume":"85 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Cincinnati Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2755003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard practice in many mega-Chapter 11 cases is to repay secured lenders at the outset of the case with the caveat that, if the repayment was inappropriate, the secured lenders will disgorge the payments. In the General Motors Chapter 11 case, a syndicate of lenders, mostly CLOs and various funds, were paid $1.5 billion at the outset of the case, even though their key financing statement had been accidentally terminated and thus they had no right to be paid. For almost seven years, the General Motors bankruptcy estate has been attempting -- at great cost -- to recover the money, and it seems unlikely that a material amount of the money will be recovered. This article explains why certain of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure need to be amended to prevent similar problems in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
15亿美元的通用汽车召回在危险的十字路口的第11章,第9条和问题资产救助计划
在许多大型破产法第11章案件中,标准做法是在案件开始时偿还有担保的贷款人,并警告说,如果还款不适当,有担保的贷款人将放弃付款。在通用汽车破产法第11章的案例中,一个由贷款机构组成的财团(主要是clo和各种基金)在案件开始时获得了15亿美元的赔偿,尽管他们的关键融资报表已被意外终止,因此他们无权获得赔偿。近七年来,通用汽车破产保护委员会一直在试图——付出巨大代价——收回这笔钱,但似乎不太可能收回大量资金。本文解释了为什么某些联邦破产程序规则需要修改,以防止将来出现类似的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The University of Cincinnati Law Review is a quarterly publication produced by second and third-year law students. The Review, along with its counterparts at all other accredited law schools, makes a significant contribution to scholarly legal literature. In addition, the Review represents the College of Law to the outside community. Each year, approximately 30 students are invited to join the Law Review as Associate Members. All Associate Members are chosen on the basis of first year grade point average combined with a writing competition score. The competition begins immediately after completion of first year studies.
期刊最新文献
The Need for a Lenient Admissibility Standard for Defense Forensic Evidence Law’s Enterprise: Argumentation Schemes & Legal Analogy State Civil Rights Remedies for Gender Violence: a Tool for Accountability Political Discrimination by Private Employers Benefit Corporation Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1