Efficacy and safety of plant-derived products for the treatment of osteoarthritis

L. Laslett, Xingzhong Jin, G. Jones
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of plant-derived products for the treatment of osteoarthritis","authors":"L. Laslett, Xingzhong Jin, G. Jones","doi":"10.2147/BTAT.S33431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \n \nPlant-derived therapies are traditionally used as medicines, but they have generally not been studied with the same rigor as pharmaceutical agents. This review summarizes the use of plant-derived products for osteoarthritis. Methods: \n \nSixty-three identified trials were summarized for pain, function, and safety outcomes using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and relative risks. Results: \n \nPlant-derived therapies are effective for treating pain compared to placebo, as assessed using visual analog scores and numerical rating scales (SMD, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–1.44), or Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain scales (SMD, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.62–1.35). Classes demonstrating overall efficacy in more than one trial for either visual analog scores or WOMAC pain included Boswellia serrata, capsaicin, and ginger; there was single-trial evidence of the efficacy of another nine agents. Plant-derived therapies have similar efficacy to an active comparator (SMD, 0.32; P = 0.08; -0.08; P = 0.14). Therapies are also effective for functional outcomes compared to placebo (SMD, 0.92; P =  Conclusion: \n \nPlant-derived therapies may be efficacious in treating osteoarthritic pain and functional limitations, and they appear to be safer than other active therapies. However, quality trials and long-term data are lacking, and the number of trials for each therapy is limited. Comparisons would be assisted by trial standardization.","PeriodicalId":91458,"journal":{"name":"Botanics : targets and therapy","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/BTAT.S33431","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanics : targets and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BTAT.S33431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Plant-derived therapies are traditionally used as medicines, but they have generally not been studied with the same rigor as pharmaceutical agents. This review summarizes the use of plant-derived products for osteoarthritis. Methods: Sixty-three identified trials were summarized for pain, function, and safety outcomes using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and relative risks. Results: Plant-derived therapies are effective for treating pain compared to placebo, as assessed using visual analog scores and numerical rating scales (SMD, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–1.44), or Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain scales (SMD, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.62–1.35). Classes demonstrating overall efficacy in more than one trial for either visual analog scores or WOMAC pain included Boswellia serrata, capsaicin, and ginger; there was single-trial evidence of the efficacy of another nine agents. Plant-derived therapies have similar efficacy to an active comparator (SMD, 0.32; P = 0.08; -0.08; P = 0.14). Therapies are also effective for functional outcomes compared to placebo (SMD, 0.92; P =  Conclusion: Plant-derived therapies may be efficacious in treating osteoarthritic pain and functional limitations, and they appear to be safer than other active therapies. However, quality trials and long-term data are lacking, and the number of trials for each therapy is limited. Comparisons would be assisted by trial standardization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物源性产品治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性
背景:植物源性疗法传统上被用作药物,但它们通常没有像药物制剂那样得到严格的研究。本文综述了植物源性产品治疗骨关节炎的应用。方法:采用标准化平均差异(SMDs)和相对风险对63项确定的试验的疼痛、功能和安全性结果进行总结。结果:与安慰剂相比,植物源性疗法在治疗疼痛方面是有效的,使用视觉模拟评分和数值评定量表(SMD, 1.08;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.72-1.44),或西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)/膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)疼痛量表(SMD, 0.98;95% ci: 0.62-1.35)。在一个以上的试验中对视觉模拟评分或WOMAC疼痛表现出总体疗效的类别包括锯齿状乳香菌、辣椒素和生姜;还有另外九种药物的疗效的单次试验证据。植物源性疗法的疗效与活性比较物相似(SMD, 0.32;p = 0.08;-0.08;p = 0.14)。与安慰剂相比,治疗对功能结局也有效(SMD, 0.92;P =结论:植物源性疗法可能对治疗骨关节炎疼痛和功能限制有效,并且它们似乎比其他积极疗法更安全。然而,缺乏高质量的试验和长期数据,每种疗法的试验数量有限。试验标准化将有助于比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phytochemicals in the treatment of hyperpigmentation Remission roles of the herbal formula B401 in mice with manganese-induced neurotoxicity The role of rose hip ( Rosa canina L) powder in alleviating arthritis pain and inflammation – part II animal and human studies Anticancer potential of Salvia miltiorrhiza and its tanshinones: an efficacy perspective The anticancer properties of phytochemical extracts from Salvia plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1