The Internet of Things and Potential Remedies in Privacy Tort Law

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems Pub Date : 2016-03-07 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2769675
Alexander H. Tran
{"title":"The Internet of Things and Potential Remedies in Privacy Tort Law","authors":"Alexander H. Tran","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2769675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet of Things (“IoT”) is an intriguing digital phenomenon in technology that creates many legal challenges as the world becomes more interconnected through the Internet. By creating a connected system, the IoT links a network of physical objects — like consumer devices — and enables these devices to communicate and exchange data. In the very near future, almost every consumer device, from cars to a coffee mug, will connect through the Internet. The IoT has incredible potential to better society by providing immense amounts of rich sensory data for analytics and other uses. Nevertheless, there are also many latent dangers including privacy violations and security risks. The legal scholarship surrounding the privacy issues of the IoT is currently underdeveloped for this exciting and frightening digital frontier. In this Note, I add to the legal discussion of privacy law by analyzing the legal repercussions of the IoT and its relationship to privacy tort law. I summarize the foundations of privacy law and current regulations that apply to the IoT before providing my potential solution. In particular, I suggest that two privacy torts, the public disclosure of private facts and intrusion upon seclusion tort, can provide partial civil remedies for consumers harmed by the IoT. Each privacy tort has evolved in different ways since their creation and I will explore their separate advantages and disadvantages. I advocate for the expanded use and revitalization of these privacy torts through judicial application in IoT cases as a potential strategy for regulating the IoT.","PeriodicalId":43291,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems","volume":"50 1","pages":"263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2769675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The Internet of Things (“IoT”) is an intriguing digital phenomenon in technology that creates many legal challenges as the world becomes more interconnected through the Internet. By creating a connected system, the IoT links a network of physical objects — like consumer devices — and enables these devices to communicate and exchange data. In the very near future, almost every consumer device, from cars to a coffee mug, will connect through the Internet. The IoT has incredible potential to better society by providing immense amounts of rich sensory data for analytics and other uses. Nevertheless, there are also many latent dangers including privacy violations and security risks. The legal scholarship surrounding the privacy issues of the IoT is currently underdeveloped for this exciting and frightening digital frontier. In this Note, I add to the legal discussion of privacy law by analyzing the legal repercussions of the IoT and its relationship to privacy tort law. I summarize the foundations of privacy law and current regulations that apply to the IoT before providing my potential solution. In particular, I suggest that two privacy torts, the public disclosure of private facts and intrusion upon seclusion tort, can provide partial civil remedies for consumers harmed by the IoT. Each privacy tort has evolved in different ways since their creation and I will explore their separate advantages and disadvantages. I advocate for the expanded use and revitalization of these privacy torts through judicial application in IoT cases as a potential strategy for regulating the IoT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物联网与隐私侵权法的潜在救济
物联网(“IoT”)是一个有趣的数字技术现象,随着世界通过互联网变得更加相互联系,它带来了许多法律挑战。通过创建一个连接的系统,物联网将物理对象(如消费设备)的网络连接起来,并使这些设备能够通信和交换数据。在不久的将来,几乎所有的消费设备,从汽车到咖啡杯,都将通过互联网连接。通过为分析和其他用途提供大量丰富的传感数据,物联网具有令人难以置信的改善社会的潜力。然而,也存在许多潜在的危险,包括侵犯隐私和安全风险。围绕物联网隐私问题的法律研究目前还不发达,不足以应对这一令人兴奋和恐惧的数字前沿。在本文中,我将通过分析物联网的法律影响及其与隐私侵权法的关系来增加对隐私法的法律讨论。在提供我的潜在解决方案之前,我总结了适用于物联网的隐私法和现行法规的基础。特别是,我建议两种隐私侵权行为,即公开披露隐私事实和侵犯隐私侵权行为,可以为受物联网损害的消费者提供部分民事救济。每一种隐私侵权行为自产生以来都以不同的方式演变,我将探讨它们各自的优点和缺点。我主张通过物联网案件的司法应用,扩大使用和振兴这些隐私侵权行为,作为监管物联网的潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Access Denied: Data Breach Litigation, Article III Standing, and a Proposed Statutory Solution When Anti-Discrimination Law Discriminates: A Right to Transgender Dignity in Disability Law Charter School Jurisprudence and the Democratic Ideal Inadequate Access: Reforming Reproductive Health Care Policies for Women Incarcerated in New York State Correctional Facilities The Internet of Things and Potential Remedies in Privacy Tort Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1