A Study of News Frames on the Controversy over Evolutionary Theories in South Korean Science Textbooks

Young-Kun Jeong
{"title":"A Study of News Frames on the Controversy over Evolutionary Theories in South Korean Science Textbooks","authors":"Young-Kun Jeong","doi":"10.22372/IJKH.2018.23.2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In December 2011 and March 2012, South Korea's Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (currently the Ministry of Education) received a “revision petition” from an organization named “Society for Textbook Revision (STR) 1 .” STR belonged to a Christian foundation called the Korea Association for Creation Research. The two petitions, specifically addressed to the Minister of Education, Science and Technology, were respectively titled “Archaeopteryx is Not a Transitional Species between Reptiles and Birds,” and “The Evolutionary Lineage of the Horse is a Pure Imagination.” STR demanded that the contents pertaining to these subjects should be deleted from high school textbooks. The Korean government forwarded the petitions to seven science textbook publishers, asking them to use their discretion on the issue. In the end, most of the publishers responded that they would remove the related","PeriodicalId":40840,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Korean History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Korean History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22372/IJKH.2018.23.2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In December 2011 and March 2012, South Korea's Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (currently the Ministry of Education) received a “revision petition” from an organization named “Society for Textbook Revision (STR) 1 .” STR belonged to a Christian foundation called the Korea Association for Creation Research. The two petitions, specifically addressed to the Minister of Education, Science and Technology, were respectively titled “Archaeopteryx is Not a Transitional Species between Reptiles and Birds,” and “The Evolutionary Lineage of the Horse is a Pure Imagination.” STR demanded that the contents pertaining to these subjects should be deleted from high school textbooks. The Korean government forwarded the petitions to seven science textbook publishers, asking them to use their discretion on the issue. In the end, most of the publishers responded that they would remove the related
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国科学教科书进化论争议的新闻框架研究
2011年12月和2012年3月,韩国教育科学技术部(现为教育部)收到了一个名为“教科书修订协会”的组织的“修订请愿书”,该组织隶属于一个名为“韩国创造研究协会”的基督教基金会。这两份请愿书分别以“始祖鸟不是爬行动物和鸟类之间的过渡物种”和“马的进化谱系是纯粹的想象”为标题,专门写给教育科学技术部长。STR要求从高中教科书中删除与这些科目有关的内容。韩国政府向7家科学教科书出版社转交了请愿书,要求他们自行处理。最后,大多数出版商回应说,他们将删除相关内容
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Censorship and autocensorship: Some considerations on the editorial history of the Parhaego Questioning Growth, Interrogating Pollution: South Korea’s Political Economic Approaches to the Environment in the Early 1970s Breaking the Myth of Nuclear Power Omnipotence in the Cold War era: Discourse on Nuclear Power and the Movement against the Construction of Nuclear Power Plants in South Korea in the 1980s and early 1990s Exploring a New Methodology for Studying Korean Ancient History Using Network Analysis: Focusing on negotiation data from the Eastern Jin and Sixteen Kingdoms to the Song and Northern Wei period “Re-membering” South Korea’s Militarized Landscapes in Pax Americana: Post-Cold War US Military Camps, Camptowns, and Former Camptown Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1