Share, Own, Access

Shelly Kreiczer-Levy
{"title":"Share, Own, Access","authors":"Shelly Kreiczer-Levy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2777119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ownership, the cornerstone of property law, is losing its prominence. Prompted by the sharing economy, digital asset-sharing and political consumerism, individuals now use, enjoy and engage with property in different ways. They share, own, and access. Access allows consumers to engage in short-term, casual use of assets on an as-needed basis. Share is a cooperative form of consumption based on participation and collaboration in the enjoyment of property (e.g., community lending libraries). This article argues that new consumption trends present an opportunity to re-imagine property. The new consumption era is a unique formative moment in public, political and legal discourse. It reinvigorate the interest in the use capacity of things. Access and share are normatively valuable alternatives to ownership that focus on use instead of control. They are forms of property relations that stand outside of property, challenge it and validate it. In particular, access reflects a choice not to have property (own or lease) but rather have a casual, short term, unattached relation to property. The law, however, makes it difficult to choose access and share and continues to privilege ownership and long-term possession. Accordingly, the article calls for reconsidering insurance, tax, tort and antidiscrimination laws. Once the article's theoretical and normative argument is accepted, regulators will need to evaluate other market and community effects.","PeriodicalId":83556,"journal":{"name":"Yale law & policy review","volume":"36 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/ssrn.2777119","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale law & policy review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2777119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Ownership, the cornerstone of property law, is losing its prominence. Prompted by the sharing economy, digital asset-sharing and political consumerism, individuals now use, enjoy and engage with property in different ways. They share, own, and access. Access allows consumers to engage in short-term, casual use of assets on an as-needed basis. Share is a cooperative form of consumption based on participation and collaboration in the enjoyment of property (e.g., community lending libraries). This article argues that new consumption trends present an opportunity to re-imagine property. The new consumption era is a unique formative moment in public, political and legal discourse. It reinvigorate the interest in the use capacity of things. Access and share are normatively valuable alternatives to ownership that focus on use instead of control. They are forms of property relations that stand outside of property, challenge it and validate it. In particular, access reflects a choice not to have property (own or lease) but rather have a casual, short term, unattached relation to property. The law, however, makes it difficult to choose access and share and continues to privilege ownership and long-term possession. Accordingly, the article calls for reconsidering insurance, tax, tort and antidiscrimination laws. Once the article's theoretical and normative argument is accepted, regulators will need to evaluate other market and community effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享、拥有、访问
所有权作为物权法的基石,正在失去其重要性。在共享经济、数字资产共享和政治消费主义的推动下,个人现在以不同的方式使用、享受和参与财产。他们共享、拥有和访问。访问允许消费者根据需要短期、随意地使用资产。分享是一种基于参与和协作享受财产的合作消费形式(例如,社区借阅图书馆)。本文认为,新的消费趋势提供了一个重新构想房地产的机会。新消费时代是公共话语、政治话语和法律话语的独特形成时刻。它重新激发了人们对事物使用能力的兴趣。访问和分享在规范上是所有权的有价值的替代方案,侧重于使用而不是控制。它们是财产关系的形式,站在财产之外,挑战它并验证它。特别是,使用权反映了一种选择,即不拥有财产(拥有或租赁),而是与财产建立一种随意的、短期的、不附加的关系。然而,法律使得选择获取和分享变得困难,并继续赋予所有权和长期占有特权。因此,文章呼吁重新考虑保险法、税法、侵权法和反歧视法。一旦文章的理论和规范论点被接受,监管者将需要评估其他市场和社区影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Share, Own, Access The City as a Commons A Sip of Cool Water: Pregnancy Accommodation after the ADA Amendments Act Municipal Constitutional Rights: A New Approach Punishing Crimes of Terror in Article III Courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1