Comparison of the efficiency of cleaning and disinfection protocols for hand endodontic instruments

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Vojnosanitetski pregled Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/vsp220913103j
Milica Jovanovic-Medojevic, Vanja Opacic-Galic, Katarina Geler, D. Pavlica
{"title":"Comparison of the efficiency of cleaning and disinfection protocols for hand endodontic instruments","authors":"Milica Jovanovic-Medojevic, Vanja Opacic-Galic, Katarina Geler, D. Pavlica","doi":"10.2298/vsp220913103j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim. There is no standard protocol for cleaning and desinfection of used endodontic instruments before their sterilization and reuse. The aim of this study wss to check the efficiency of the different methods of removing biological debris from different type of used hand stainless steel endodontic instruments. Methods. A total of 120 instruments (forty Kerr-Reamers, Kerr-Files and Hedstr?m-Files) (Shenzhen Denco Medical Co., Ltd. Guangdong, China) ISO 25 were analyzed. The instruments used for root canal treatment on extracted teeth were divided into 4 groups based on different decontamination protocols. The evaluation of the efficiency of the cleaning methods was based on the evaluation of the amount of stained organic residues (Van Gieson staining). Samples were analyzed by stereomicroscopy (X40). Statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney and ANOVAOneWay/Bonfferoni test at a significance level of 5% (? = 0.05). Results. Residual biological debris was observed on 93.33% of all the samples taken. The thermal disinfectant cleaning method showed the lowest contamination values for all types of instruments. The method of mechanical cleaning showed the mean value of Maximum Biologic Contamination (MBC) of the Kerr-Reamers (58.54 %) and Kerr-Files (56.25%) and for Hedstr?m-Files the highest MBC was shown by the ultrasonic method contamination (50.21 %). Conclusion. The use of a thermal disinfectant was the most efficient cleaning method for all three types of hand endodontic instruments.","PeriodicalId":23531,"journal":{"name":"Vojnosanitetski pregled","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vojnosanitetski pregled","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp220913103j","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim. There is no standard protocol for cleaning and desinfection of used endodontic instruments before their sterilization and reuse. The aim of this study wss to check the efficiency of the different methods of removing biological debris from different type of used hand stainless steel endodontic instruments. Methods. A total of 120 instruments (forty Kerr-Reamers, Kerr-Files and Hedstr?m-Files) (Shenzhen Denco Medical Co., Ltd. Guangdong, China) ISO 25 were analyzed. The instruments used for root canal treatment on extracted teeth were divided into 4 groups based on different decontamination protocols. The evaluation of the efficiency of the cleaning methods was based on the evaluation of the amount of stained organic residues (Van Gieson staining). Samples were analyzed by stereomicroscopy (X40). Statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney and ANOVAOneWay/Bonfferoni test at a significance level of 5% (? = 0.05). Results. Residual biological debris was observed on 93.33% of all the samples taken. The thermal disinfectant cleaning method showed the lowest contamination values for all types of instruments. The method of mechanical cleaning showed the mean value of Maximum Biologic Contamination (MBC) of the Kerr-Reamers (58.54 %) and Kerr-Files (56.25%) and for Hedstr?m-Files the highest MBC was shown by the ultrasonic method contamination (50.21 %). Conclusion. The use of a thermal disinfectant was the most efficient cleaning method for all three types of hand endodontic instruments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手部根管器械清洁和消毒方案效率的比较
背景/目的。在使用过的根管器械灭菌和重复使用之前,没有标准的清洁和消毒方案。本研究的目的是检查不同方法去除不同类型的二手不锈钢根管器械的生物碎片的效率。方法。共120台仪器(Kerr-Reamers、Kerr-Files、Hedstr - m-Files各40台)(深圳登科医疗有限公司)对ISO 25进行了分析。拔牙根管治疗器械根据不同的去污方案分为4组。评估清洗方法的效率是基于评估染色的有机残留物(Van Gieson染色)的数量。采用体视显微镜(X40)对样品进行分析。统计学分析采用Mann-Whitney和anova检验,显著性水平为5% (?= 0.05)。结果。93.33%的样品残留有生物碎屑。热消毒液清洗法对各类仪器的污染值最低。机械清洗的Kerr-Reamers和Kerr-Files的最大生物污染(MBC)平均值为58.54%和56.25%,而Hedstr?超声法污染m-Files的MBC最高(50.21%)。结论。热消毒液是三种手部根管器械最有效的清洁方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Vojnosanitetski pregled MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vojnosanitetski pregled (VSP) is a leading medical journal of physicians and pharmacists of the Serbian Army. The Journal is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to Management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the elbow trochlea in the adolescent population: A systematic review. Neurophysiological confirmation of phrenic nerve affection in patient with dyspnea and herpes zoster Acute coronary syndrome in a young patient with ECG presentation of acute inferior myocardial infarction and acute thrombosis of left main stem coronary artery Gadolinium deposition in the brain of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after 10 years of follow-up Prevalence of computer vision syndrome in computer users: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1