What works in the psychological treatment of child conduct problems? An umbrella review of meta-analytic studies

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Ninos y Adolescentes Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21134/rpcna.2023.10.1.1
E. Romero
{"title":"What works in the psychological treatment of child conduct problems? An umbrella review of meta-analytic studies","authors":"E. Romero","doi":"10.21134/rpcna.2023.10.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conduct problems (CP) constitute a major field for child clinical psychology, in terms of not only prevalence, but also developmental, social, and clinical relevance. This study carried out an umbrella review of meta-analyses on the efficacy of treatment/indicated prevention of child CP (mean age range up to 12 years). Following a registered protocol, several databases (i.e., Web of Science, PsycINFO, PROSPERO, and The Cochrane Library) were searched for meta-analyses published from January 2002 to March 2022. Nine meta-analytic publications met the required criteria, and the main characteristics and findings of the studies were systematically described. Weighted effect sizes (ESs) were calculated through RStudio program. Analyses of heterogeneity, publication bias, quality (AMSTAR-2), and credibility were also conducted. Results indicate that parent training has been the most studied intervention, with a weighted ES of d = -0.49 (95% CI -.67 to -.32). The reviewed studies identified several moderators for the efficacy of parent training, including individual (severity of CP), family (financial disadvantage), and intervention (delivery format) characteristics. Results from child-centered play therapy were also analyzed, d = -.34 (95% CI -.40 to -.28), but the reduced number of meta-analyses and the weakness detected by quality assessment suggest the need of cautiously considering the pooled effects. In general, evidence seems to be suggestive of the efficacy of treatment of CP, particularly for parent training. Nevertheless, efficacy seems to be moderate, heterogeneity indexes are high, and quality assessments of meta-analyses are often suboptimal. This study suggests several avenues to strengthen knowledge in this field","PeriodicalId":43399,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Ninos y Adolescentes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Ninos y Adolescentes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2023.10.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conduct problems (CP) constitute a major field for child clinical psychology, in terms of not only prevalence, but also developmental, social, and clinical relevance. This study carried out an umbrella review of meta-analyses on the efficacy of treatment/indicated prevention of child CP (mean age range up to 12 years). Following a registered protocol, several databases (i.e., Web of Science, PsycINFO, PROSPERO, and The Cochrane Library) were searched for meta-analyses published from January 2002 to March 2022. Nine meta-analytic publications met the required criteria, and the main characteristics and findings of the studies were systematically described. Weighted effect sizes (ESs) were calculated through RStudio program. Analyses of heterogeneity, publication bias, quality (AMSTAR-2), and credibility were also conducted. Results indicate that parent training has been the most studied intervention, with a weighted ES of d = -0.49 (95% CI -.67 to -.32). The reviewed studies identified several moderators for the efficacy of parent training, including individual (severity of CP), family (financial disadvantage), and intervention (delivery format) characteristics. Results from child-centered play therapy were also analyzed, d = -.34 (95% CI -.40 to -.28), but the reduced number of meta-analyses and the weakness detected by quality assessment suggest the need of cautiously considering the pooled effects. In general, evidence seems to be suggestive of the efficacy of treatment of CP, particularly for parent training. Nevertheless, efficacy seems to be moderate, heterogeneity indexes are high, and quality assessments of meta-analyses are often suboptimal. This study suggests several avenues to strengthen knowledge in this field
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么在儿童行为问题的心理治疗中起作用?元分析研究概括性综述
行为问题(CP)是儿童临床心理学的一个重要领域,不仅在患病率方面,而且在发展、社会和临床方面都有相关性。本研究对儿童CP(平均年龄至12岁)的治疗/指示性预防效果的荟萃分析进行了综合回顾。按照注册协议,检索了几个数据库(即Web of Science、PsycINFO、PROSPERO和The Cochrane Library),以检索2002年1月至2022年3月间发表的元分析。9篇元分析出版物符合要求的标准,并系统地描述了研究的主要特征和发现。通过RStudio程序计算加权效应量(ESs)。对异质性、发表偏倚、质量(AMSTAR-2)和可信度也进行了分析。结果表明,父母培训是研究最多的干预措施,加权ES为d = -0.49 (95% CI为-)。67到- 0.32)。回顾的研究确定了父母培训效果的几个调节因素,包括个人(CP严重程度)、家庭(经济劣势)和干预(交付形式)特征。以儿童为中心的游戏治疗结果也进行了分析,d = - 0.34(95% ci -。40至- 0.28),但meta分析数量的减少和质量评估发现的不足表明需要谨慎考虑综合效应。总的来说,证据似乎暗示了治疗CP的有效性,特别是对父母的培训。然而,疗效似乎是中等的,异质性指数高,荟萃分析的质量评估往往是次优的。本研究提出了加强这一领域知识的几种途径
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Revisión de revisiones sobre la eficacia de los tratamientos psicológicos para adolescentes con trastorno de la personalidad límite How effective are psychological treatments for internet gaming disorder? An umbrella review El tratamiento psicológico del insomnio durante la infancia: Una revisión paraguas What works in the psychological treatment of child conduct problems? An umbrella review of meta-analytic studies Effectiveness of psychological interventions for eating disorders in adolescence: An overview of systematic reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1