Construcción y validación del Cuestionario de Pica y Rumiación (CuPRu) en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes mexicanos

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Ninos y Adolescentes Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21134/rpcna.2023.10.2.2
Karla Areli Medina-Tepal, R. Vázquez-Arévalo, Nazira Calleja-Bello, J. M. Mancilla-Díaz
{"title":"Construcción y validación del Cuestionario de Pica y Rumiación (CuPRu) en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes mexicanos","authors":"Karla Areli Medina-Tepal, R. Vázquez-Arévalo, Nazira Calleja-Bello, J. M. Mancilla-Díaz","doi":"10.21134/rpcna.2023.10.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction and validation of the Pica and Rumination Questionnaire in Mexican adolescents and young adults. Research on Pica and Rumination Disorders has focused on children, people with disabilities, and pregnant women. This has important implications because it is unknown whether these occur at other stages of development and in other populations. These conditions leads to important health problems and can even lead to death, so it is essential to have valid and reliable screening instruments. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop an instrument to detect the symptoms and behaviors of Pica and Rumination disorders, as well as to determine their psychometric properties in Mexican adolescents and young adults. The items were prepared from the review of the literature and were subsequently submitted for review by seven experts in the area, obtaining Aiken’s V coefficients that indicate a high agreement between judges regarding the content of the instrument. Likewise, the reliability of the scale was verified from the calculation of the alpha and omega coefficients, where the following indices were obtained: 0.85 and 0.93. Subsequently, an Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was carried out, where a structure of four factors was achieved that explains 48.35% of the variance, in addition to the following indices that corroborate an adequate fit CMIN = 2.41, GFI = 0.92; AGFI = 0.89; CFI = 0.93; RMR =.063 and RMSEA = 0.064. Finally, the calibration of the reagents was carried out where it was observed that all discriminated adequately. In conclusion, the psychometric properties obtained in this study show that the Pica and Rumination Questionnaire is valid and reliable.","PeriodicalId":43399,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Ninos y Adolescentes","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Ninos y Adolescentes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2023.10.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction and validation of the Pica and Rumination Questionnaire in Mexican adolescents and young adults. Research on Pica and Rumination Disorders has focused on children, people with disabilities, and pregnant women. This has important implications because it is unknown whether these occur at other stages of development and in other populations. These conditions leads to important health problems and can even lead to death, so it is essential to have valid and reliable screening instruments. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop an instrument to detect the symptoms and behaviors of Pica and Rumination disorders, as well as to determine their psychometric properties in Mexican adolescents and young adults. The items were prepared from the review of the literature and were subsequently submitted for review by seven experts in the area, obtaining Aiken’s V coefficients that indicate a high agreement between judges regarding the content of the instrument. Likewise, the reliability of the scale was verified from the calculation of the alpha and omega coefficients, where the following indices were obtained: 0.85 and 0.93. Subsequently, an Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was carried out, where a structure of four factors was achieved that explains 48.35% of the variance, in addition to the following indices that corroborate an adequate fit CMIN = 2.41, GFI = 0.92; AGFI = 0.89; CFI = 0.93; RMR =.063 and RMSEA = 0.064. Finally, the calibration of the reagents was carried out where it was observed that all discriminated adequately. In conclusion, the psychometric properties obtained in this study show that the Pica and Rumination Questionnaire is valid and reliable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥青少年和年轻人的异食和反刍问卷(CuPRu)的构建和验证
墨西哥青少年异食癖与反刍问卷的建构与验证。异食癖和反刍障碍的研究主要集中在儿童、残疾人和孕妇身上。这具有重要意义,因为尚不清楚这些是否发生在其他发育阶段和其他人群中。这些情况会导致严重的健康问题,甚至可能导致死亡,因此拥有有效和可靠的筛查工具至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种仪器来检测异食癖和反刍障碍的症状和行为,并确定其在墨西哥青少年和年轻人中的心理测量特性。这些项目是根据对文献的审查编写的,随后提交给该领域的七名专家进行审查,获得Aiken V系数,表明法官之间对文书内容的高度一致。同样,从alpha和omega系数的计算中验证量表的可靠性,其中得到以下指标:0.85和0.93。随后,进行了探索性和验证性因子分析,其中实现了四个因素的结构,解释了48.35%的方差,此外还有以下指标证实了适当的拟合CMIN = 2.41, GFI = 0.92;Agfi = 0.89;Cfi = 0.93;RMR =。063和RMSEA = 0.064。最后,对试剂进行校准,观察到所有试剂都被充分区分。综上所述,本研究获得的心理测量特征表明异食癖反刍问卷是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Revisión de revisiones sobre la eficacia de los tratamientos psicológicos para adolescentes con trastorno de la personalidad límite How effective are psychological treatments for internet gaming disorder? An umbrella review El tratamiento psicológico del insomnio durante la infancia: Una revisión paraguas What works in the psychological treatment of child conduct problems? An umbrella review of meta-analytic studies Effectiveness of psychological interventions for eating disorders in adolescence: An overview of systematic reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1