A Natural Axiomatization of Computability and Proof of Church's Thesis

IF 0.7 3区 数学 Q1 LOGIC Bulletin of Symbolic Logic Pub Date : 2008-09-01 DOI:10.2178/bsl/1231081370
N. Dershowitz, Y. Gurevich
{"title":"A Natural Axiomatization of Computability and Proof of Church's Thesis","authors":"N. Dershowitz, Y. Gurevich","doi":"10.2178/bsl/1231081370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Church's Thesis asserts that the only numeric functions that can be calculated by effective means are the recursive ones, which are the same, extensionally, as the Turing-computable numeric functions. The Abstract State Machine Theorem states that every classical algorithm is behaviorally equivalent to an abstract state machine. This theorem presupposes three natural postulates about algorithmic computation. Here, we show that augmenting those postulates with an additional requirement regarding basic operations gives a natural axiomatization of computability and a proof of Church's Thesis, as Gödel and others suggested may be possible. In a similar way, but with a different set of basic operations, one can prove Turing's Thesis, characterizing the effective string functions, and—in particular—the effectively-computable functions on string representations of numbers.","PeriodicalId":55307,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":"14 1","pages":"299 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2178/bsl/1231081370","citationCount":"113","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1231081370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

Abstract

Abstract Church's Thesis asserts that the only numeric functions that can be calculated by effective means are the recursive ones, which are the same, extensionally, as the Turing-computable numeric functions. The Abstract State Machine Theorem states that every classical algorithm is behaviorally equivalent to an abstract state machine. This theorem presupposes three natural postulates about algorithmic computation. Here, we show that augmenting those postulates with an additional requirement regarding basic operations gives a natural axiomatization of computability and a proof of Church's Thesis, as Gödel and others suggested may be possible. In a similar way, but with a different set of basic operations, one can prove Turing's Thesis, characterizing the effective string functions, and—in particular—the effectively-computable functions on string representations of numbers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可计算性的自然公理化及丘奇命题的证明
丘奇(Church)的论文认为,唯一可以用有效的方法计算的数值函数是递归函数,它在广义上与图灵可计算的数值函数相同。抽象状态机定理指出,每个经典算法在行为上都等同于抽象状态机。这个定理以三个关于算法计算的自然假设为前提。在这里,我们证明了用一个关于基本操作的额外要求来扩充这些假设,给出了可计算性的自然公理化和丘奇论文的证明,正如Gödel和其他人所建议的那样可能是可能的。以类似的方式,但使用一组不同的基本操作,人们可以证明图灵的论文,描述有效的字符串函数,特别是有效的可计算函数,在字符串表示的数字上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic was established in 1995 by the Association for Symbolic Logic to provide a journal of high standards that would be both accessible and of interest to as wide an audience as possible. It is designed to cover all areas within the purview of the ASL: mathematical logic and its applications, philosophical and non-classical logic and its applications, history and philosophy of logic, and philosophy and methodology of mathematics.
期刊最新文献
Formal Logic of Sentences, Sentential Logic (also called Sentential Logic and Statement Logic) Semantic Models for ∏: ∏⧉ Basics of Set Theory Concepts of Deductive Reasoning Proof-Theoretical System for Predicate Logic: ∏πφ=
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1