Open innovation

IF 0.2 Q4 BUSINESS Revista Brasileira de Inovacao Pub Date : 2022-10-08 DOI:10.20396/rbi.v21i00.8665685
Renata Borges, Gilvan Augusto Silva
{"title":"Open innovation","authors":"Renata Borges, Gilvan Augusto Silva","doi":"10.20396/rbi.v21i00.8665685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to understand how startups and established companies perceive the factors that are critical to the cooperation between them in the context of corporate incubation programs. We interviewed innovation managers, analysts, and project leaders from three large companies and the entrepreneurs of the startups that interacted with these companies. The results show that established companies and startups have different perceptions regarding insufficient dedication to the program and cultural differences, although both considered these factors to constrain the collaboration. Regarding motivation and incentives and autonomy, the findings were to some extent different. Implications include the difference in the perceptions of the startups and employees of the established companies directly involved in the program and the two factors identified as critical—dedication to the program and cultural differences—due to their potential to risk the incubation program. To practitioners, this research offers empirical results that can guide decision-making to manage corporate incubation programs.","PeriodicalId":41641,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Inovacao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Inovacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v21i00.8665685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this research is to understand how startups and established companies perceive the factors that are critical to the cooperation between them in the context of corporate incubation programs. We interviewed innovation managers, analysts, and project leaders from three large companies and the entrepreneurs of the startups that interacted with these companies. The results show that established companies and startups have different perceptions regarding insufficient dedication to the program and cultural differences, although both considered these factors to constrain the collaboration. Regarding motivation and incentives and autonomy, the findings were to some extent different. Implications include the difference in the perceptions of the startups and employees of the established companies directly involved in the program and the two factors identified as critical—dedication to the program and cultural differences—due to their potential to risk the incubation program. To practitioners, this research offers empirical results that can guide decision-making to manage corporate incubation programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放创新
本研究的目的是了解在企业孵化项目的背景下,初创公司和成熟公司如何看待对他们之间的合作至关重要的因素。我们采访了来自三家大公司的创新经理、分析师和项目负责人,以及与这些公司互动的初创公司的企业家。结果表明,成熟公司和初创公司对项目投入不足和文化差异有不同的看法,尽管两者都认为这些因素限制了合作。在动机、激励和自主性方面,调查结果在某种程度上有所不同。影响包括初创公司和直接参与项目的老牌公司员工的看法差异,以及被确定为关键的两个因素——对项目的投入和文化差异——因为他们可能会冒孵化项目的风险。对于从业者而言,本研究的实证结果可以指导企业孵化项目的管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spin-offs acadêmicas e seus determinantes exógenos Distribuição espacial de inovadores schumpeterianos Open innovation Family involvement and innovation Políticas setoriais e inovação
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1