The Need to Attend to Probabilities (for Purposes of Self-Defense and Other Preemptive Actions)

L. Alexander
{"title":"The Need to Attend to Probabilities (for Purposes of Self-Defense and Other Preemptive Actions)","authors":"L. Alexander","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2909273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this short essay I ask what must someone acting in defense of others believe and with what level of credence in order not to be culpable for so acting. I focus on defense of others to avoid the issue of excuse, as the defender of others is not acting out of fear for his own safety, a fear that might excuse the defensive acts of the victim of the feared attack. I focus on beliefs and levels of credence because no defender can know for certain the factors relevant to permissible defensive actions.","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"55 1","pages":"223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The San Diego law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2909273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this short essay I ask what must someone acting in defense of others believe and with what level of credence in order not to be culpable for so acting. I focus on defense of others to avoid the issue of excuse, as the defender of others is not acting out of fear for his own safety, a fear that might excuse the defensive acts of the victim of the feared attack. I focus on beliefs and levels of credence because no defender can know for certain the factors relevant to permissible defensive actions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意概率的必要性(为了自卫和其他先发制人的行动)
在这篇短文中,我想问的是,一个为他人辩护的人必须相信什么,要有多大程度的信任,才能不因自己的行为而受到谴责。我专注于为他人辩护,以避免借口的问题,因为他人的捍卫者不是出于对自己安全的恐惧而采取行动,这种恐惧可能会原谅受害者的防御行为。我关注的是信念和信任水平,因为没有防守者可以确切地知道与允许的防守行动相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to 'How Foot Voting Enhances Political Freedom' Is There Hope for Change? The Evolution of Conceptions of 'Good' Corporate Governance Extending Miranda: Prohibition on Police Lies Regarding the Incriminating Evidence The Vindication of Good Over Evil: “Futile” Self-Defense The Case for Varying Standards of Proof
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1