Methods of Learning and Teaching

IF 8.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Educational Research Pub Date : 1941-10-01 DOI:10.2307/1168644
William E. Young
{"title":"Methods of Learning and Teaching","authors":"William E. Young","doi":"10.2307/1168644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HODGKINS (46) gave a summary description of all the new methods of teaching with their applications to the social studies, and concluded that the experimental studies in comparative teaching methods have been thus far rather indecisive. Hockett (45) annotated research studies in the field of social studies in the April 1937 number of the REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. In the February 1938 issue of the REVIEW, Wilson (113) did a similar survey of research in the social studies. In both of these summary statements, a special section of the chapter was devoted to methods. Horn (47), in his report in 1937 for the Commission on the Social Studies, attempted to canvass all the recent literature (up to 1937), including unpublished theses, on methods of teaching and learning in the social studies. Phillips (80), in a chapter in the 1937 yearbook of the National Council for the Social Studies, reviewed ten research studies on methods carried out from 1928 through 1935. He listed sixty-three additional studies dated from 1921 through 1935. In this same publication Davey and Hill (17) evaluated six studies, ranging from 1927 to 1931, on the effectiveness of the so-called Morrison unit-mastery plan as compared with other methods of instruction, and reached the conclusion that the superiority of any one method had not been established.","PeriodicalId":21145,"journal":{"name":"Review of Educational Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"446"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"1941-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1168644","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1168644","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

HODGKINS (46) gave a summary description of all the new methods of teaching with their applications to the social studies, and concluded that the experimental studies in comparative teaching methods have been thus far rather indecisive. Hockett (45) annotated research studies in the field of social studies in the April 1937 number of the REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. In the February 1938 issue of the REVIEW, Wilson (113) did a similar survey of research in the social studies. In both of these summary statements, a special section of the chapter was devoted to methods. Horn (47), in his report in 1937 for the Commission on the Social Studies, attempted to canvass all the recent literature (up to 1937), including unpublished theses, on methods of teaching and learning in the social studies. Phillips (80), in a chapter in the 1937 yearbook of the National Council for the Social Studies, reviewed ten research studies on methods carried out from 1928 through 1935. He listed sixty-three additional studies dated from 1921 through 1935. In this same publication Davey and Hill (17) evaluated six studies, ranging from 1927 to 1931, on the effectiveness of the so-called Morrison unit-mastery plan as compared with other methods of instruction, and reached the conclusion that the superiority of any one method had not been established.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习和教学方法
HODGKINS(46)对所有新的教学方法及其在社会学中的应用进行了总结描述,并得出结论:迄今为止,比较教学方法的实验研究相当犹豫不决。Hockett(45岁)在1937年4月号的《教育研究评论》(REVIEW of EDUCATIONAL research)上注释了社会研究领域的研究。在1938年2月的《评论》上,威尔逊(113)做了一个类似的社会研究调查。在这两个总结陈述中,本章专门用了一个部分来讨论方法。霍恩(47岁)在1937年为社会研究委员会撰写的报告中,试图查阅所有最近的文献(直到1937年),包括未发表的关于社会研究教学方法的论文。菲利普斯(80岁)在1937年全国社会研究委员会年鉴的一个章节中,回顾了从1928年到1935年进行的十项方法研究。他列举了从1921年到1935年的另外63项研究。在同一篇文章中,Davey和Hill(17)评估了从1927年到1931年的六项研究,将所谓的莫里森单元掌握计划与其他教学方法进行了比较,并得出结论,任何一种方法的优越性都没有得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Educational Research
Review of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Review of Educational Research (RER), a quarterly publication initiated in 1931 with approximately 640 pages per volume year, is dedicated to presenting critical, integrative reviews of research literature relevant to education. These reviews encompass conceptualizations, interpretations, and syntheses of scholarly work across fields broadly pertinent to education and educational research. Welcoming submissions from any discipline, RER encourages research reviews in psychology, sociology, history, philosophy, political science, economics, computer science, statistics, anthropology, and biology, provided the review addresses educational issues. While original empirical research is not published independently, RER incorporates it within broader integrative reviews. The journal may occasionally feature solicited, rigorously refereed analytic reviews of special topics, especially from disciplines underrepresented in educational research.
期刊最新文献
Development and Feasibility Pilot Study of Indigenous Recovery Planning: A Community-Engaged Approach to Addressing Substance Use in a Native Community. Multidimensional Framing of Environments Beyond Blocks and Texts in K–12 Programming Robots’ Social Behaviors for Language Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis The Emergence and Escalation of Online Racial Discrimination in Digital Spaces: A Systematic Review Assessing Teachers’ Culturally Responsive Classroom Practice in PK–12 Schools: A Systematic Review of Teacher-, Student-, and Observer-Report Measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1