Pro-Competitive Regulatory Policies For Post-Paid And Pre-Paid Mobile Phone Markets

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economic Annals Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2298/eka1818085t
D. Trifunović, Djordje Mitrović
{"title":"Pro-Competitive Regulatory Policies For Post-Paid And Pre-Paid Mobile Phone Markets","authors":"D. Trifunović, Djordje Mitrović","doi":"10.2298/eka1818085t","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two types of switching costs when users change their mobile operator. The first stems from price discrimination when the network charges a lower price for on-net than for off-net calls. If the majority of the switching user’s contacts are in their current network, this imposes an obstacle to changing the network, since in the new network they would have to pay a higher price for off-net calls. The other switching cost results from the switching user having to inform all their contacts about their new number in the other network. Mobile phone number portability (NP) reduces this switching cost. This paper’s aim is to determine pro-competitive regulatory policies for the post-paid and pre-paid market segments. This distinction is important since the post-paid market dominates in developed countries, while in less developed countries the prepaid market dominates. There are two operators in our model, the incumbent and a new entrant. In the postpaid market, NP reduces the level of market concentration. In the pre-paid market, NP has no impact on the convergence of market shares, and the reduction of access charges (the fee for terminating calls in the rival network) turns out to be a pro-competitive regulatory policy. There is no need for asymmetric access regulation where the incumbent pays higher access charges than the new entrant.","PeriodicalId":35023,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/eka1818085t","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are two types of switching costs when users change their mobile operator. The first stems from price discrimination when the network charges a lower price for on-net than for off-net calls. If the majority of the switching user’s contacts are in their current network, this imposes an obstacle to changing the network, since in the new network they would have to pay a higher price for off-net calls. The other switching cost results from the switching user having to inform all their contacts about their new number in the other network. Mobile phone number portability (NP) reduces this switching cost. This paper’s aim is to determine pro-competitive regulatory policies for the post-paid and pre-paid market segments. This distinction is important since the post-paid market dominates in developed countries, while in less developed countries the prepaid market dominates. There are two operators in our model, the incumbent and a new entrant. In the postpaid market, NP reduces the level of market concentration. In the pre-paid market, NP has no impact on the convergence of market shares, and the reduction of access charges (the fee for terminating calls in the rival network) turns out to be a pro-competitive regulatory policy. There is no need for asymmetric access regulation where the incumbent pays higher access charges than the new entrant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后付费和预付费手机市场的竞争监管政策
当用户更换移动运营商时,有两种类型的转换成本。第一个问题源于价格歧视,即网络对在线通话的收费低于离线通话的收费。如果切换用户的大多数联系人都在他们当前的网络中,这就给改变网络设置了障碍,因为在新的网络中,他们将不得不为非网络呼叫支付更高的价格。另一个交换成本来自于交换用户必须将其在另一个网络中的新号码通知其所有联系人。移动电话号码可移植性(NP)降低了这种交换成本。本文的目的是确定后付费和预付费细分市场的有利于竞争的监管政策。这种区别很重要,因为后付费市场在发达国家占主导地位,而在欠发达国家,预付费市场占主导地位。在我们的模型中有两个运营商,一个是现有的,另一个是新进入者。在后付费市场中,NP降低了市场集中度。在预付费市场中,NP对市场份额的趋同没有影响,降低接入费(在竞争对手网络中终止通话的费用)被证明是一种有利于竞争的监管政策。不需要不对称的准入监管,即现有者比新进入者支付更高的准入费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Annals
Economic Annals Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Economic Annals is an academic journal that has been published on a quarterly basis since 1955, initially under its Serbian name of Ekonomski anali (EconLit). Since 2006 it has been published exclusively in English. It is published by the Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbia. The journal publishes research in all areas of economics. The Editorial Board welcomes contributions that explore economic issues in a comparative perspective with a focus on transition and emerging economies in Europe and around the world. The journal encourages the submission of original unpublished works, not under consideration by other journals or publications. All submitted papers undergo a double blind refereeing process. Authors are expected to follow standard publication procedures [Instructions to Authors], to recognise the values of the international academic community and to respect the journal’s Policy.
期刊最新文献
Remittances-finance-growth trilogy: Do remittance and financial development complement or substitute each other to affect growth in Nigeria? Analysing the Armey curve based on the Fourier cointegration approach for Turkey Egalitarianism and redistributive reform in Serbia after 2000 The effectiveness of bilateral investment treaties in attracting foreign direct investment: The case of Serbia Investigation of the sunspots and GDP nexus: The case of Balkan countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1