The influence of the Washington Consensus programme on the transitional economies of Eastern Europe - a firm-level analysis

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economic Annals Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2298/eka2026009h
Peter Howard-Jones, J. Hölscher
{"title":"The influence of the Washington Consensus programme on the transitional economies of Eastern Europe - a firm-level analysis","authors":"Peter Howard-Jones, J. Hölscher","doi":"10.2298/eka2026009h","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the effectiveness of the Washington Consensus (WC) programme as a mechanism for improving national welfare in transition and emerging economies, using its internalisation by the European Union (EU) as a proxy. The results indicate that there is a positive benefit to firms with accession to the EU, leading to greater productivity improvement and performance advantages than in non-member states. Foreign direct investment directly benefitted those firms that became investees, with little evidence of spillovers to domestic companies. The vertical nature of the investment, with an emphasis on international production networks that utilise significant levels of foreign inputs, infers protection of intellectual property and a reduction in value added, with results indicating a failure to achieve an export multiplier. There is evidence of substantial benefits accruing to firms in receipt of loans, but the apparent paucity of their availability may imply market failure. The gains made by innovative firms do not appear to do justice to the initiatives undertaken and may indicate a dilution of national innovative capacity.","PeriodicalId":35023,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/eka2026009h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores the effectiveness of the Washington Consensus (WC) programme as a mechanism for improving national welfare in transition and emerging economies, using its internalisation by the European Union (EU) as a proxy. The results indicate that there is a positive benefit to firms with accession to the EU, leading to greater productivity improvement and performance advantages than in non-member states. Foreign direct investment directly benefitted those firms that became investees, with little evidence of spillovers to domestic companies. The vertical nature of the investment, with an emphasis on international production networks that utilise significant levels of foreign inputs, infers protection of intellectual property and a reduction in value added, with results indicating a failure to achieve an export multiplier. There is evidence of substantial benefits accruing to firms in receipt of loans, but the apparent paucity of their availability may imply market failure. The gains made by innovative firms do not appear to do justice to the initiatives undertaken and may indicate a dilution of national innovative capacity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《华盛顿共识》方案对东欧转型经济的影响- -公司一级的分析
本研究以欧盟(EU)的内部化为代表,探讨了华盛顿共识(WC)计划作为改善转型和新兴经济体国民福利机制的有效性。结果表明,与非欧盟国家相比,加入欧盟对企业有积极的好处,导致更大的生产率提高和绩效优势。外国直接投资直接使那些成为投资对象的公司受益,几乎没有证据表明对国内公司有溢出效应。投资的垂直性质,强调利用大量外国投入的国际生产网络,推断出知识产权的保护和增加值的减少,其结果表明未能实现出口乘数。有证据表明,获得贷款的公司获得了可观的利益,但明显缺乏贷款可能意味着市场失灵。创新企业所取得的收益似乎与所采取的举措不相称,可能表明国家创新能力的削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Annals
Economic Annals Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Economic Annals is an academic journal that has been published on a quarterly basis since 1955, initially under its Serbian name of Ekonomski anali (EconLit). Since 2006 it has been published exclusively in English. It is published by the Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbia. The journal publishes research in all areas of economics. The Editorial Board welcomes contributions that explore economic issues in a comparative perspective with a focus on transition and emerging economies in Europe and around the world. The journal encourages the submission of original unpublished works, not under consideration by other journals or publications. All submitted papers undergo a double blind refereeing process. Authors are expected to follow standard publication procedures [Instructions to Authors], to recognise the values of the international academic community and to respect the journal’s Policy.
期刊最新文献
Remittances-finance-growth trilogy: Do remittance and financial development complement or substitute each other to affect growth in Nigeria? Analysing the Armey curve based on the Fourier cointegration approach for Turkey Egalitarianism and redistributive reform in Serbia after 2000 The effectiveness of bilateral investment treaties in attracting foreign direct investment: The case of Serbia Investigation of the sunspots and GDP nexus: The case of Balkan countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1