Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value

W. Bratton
{"title":"Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value","authors":"W. Bratton","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.301475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the implications that the Enron collapse holds out for the self regulatory system of corporate governance. The case shows that the incentive structure that motivates actors in the system generates much less powerful checks against abuse than many observers have believed. Even as academics have proclaimed rising governance standards, some standards have declined, particularly those addressed to the numerology of shareholder value. The article's inquiry begins with Enron's business plan. The article asserts that there may be more to Enron's \"virtual firm\" strategy than meets the eye beholding a firm in collapse. The article restates the strategy as an application of the incomplete contracts theory of the firm that prevails in microeconomics today and asserts that Enron failed because its pursuit of immediate shareholder value caused it to misapply the economics, mistaking its own inflated stock market capitalization for fundamental value. The article proceeds to Enron's collapse, telling four causation stories. This ex ante description draws on information available to the actors who forced Enron into bankruptcy in December 2001. The discussion accounts for the behavior of Enron's principals by reference to the shareholder value norm and Enron's corporate culture. Finally, the article takes up the self regulatory system of corporate governance, asserting that the case justifies no fundamental reform. The costs of any significant new regulation can outweigh the compliance yield, particularly in a system committed to open a wide field for entrepreneurial risk taking. If we seek high returns, we must discount for the risk that rationality and reputation will sometimes prove inadequate as constraints. At the same time, we should hold critical gatekeepers, particularly auditors, to high professional standards. The article argues that present reform discussions respecting the audit function do not adequately confront the problem of capture demonstrated in this case.","PeriodicalId":83377,"journal":{"name":"Tulane law review","volume":"76 1","pages":"1275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.301475","citationCount":"180","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tulane law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.301475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 180

Abstract

This article addresses the implications that the Enron collapse holds out for the self regulatory system of corporate governance. The case shows that the incentive structure that motivates actors in the system generates much less powerful checks against abuse than many observers have believed. Even as academics have proclaimed rising governance standards, some standards have declined, particularly those addressed to the numerology of shareholder value. The article's inquiry begins with Enron's business plan. The article asserts that there may be more to Enron's "virtual firm" strategy than meets the eye beholding a firm in collapse. The article restates the strategy as an application of the incomplete contracts theory of the firm that prevails in microeconomics today and asserts that Enron failed because its pursuit of immediate shareholder value caused it to misapply the economics, mistaking its own inflated stock market capitalization for fundamental value. The article proceeds to Enron's collapse, telling four causation stories. This ex ante description draws on information available to the actors who forced Enron into bankruptcy in December 2001. The discussion accounts for the behavior of Enron's principals by reference to the shareholder value norm and Enron's corporate culture. Finally, the article takes up the self regulatory system of corporate governance, asserting that the case justifies no fundamental reform. The costs of any significant new regulation can outweigh the compliance yield, particularly in a system committed to open a wide field for entrepreneurial risk taking. If we seek high returns, we must discount for the risk that rationality and reputation will sometimes prove inadequate as constraints. At the same time, we should hold critical gatekeepers, particularly auditors, to high professional standards. The article argues that present reform discussions respecting the audit function do not adequately confront the problem of capture demonstrated in this case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安然和股东价值的阴暗面
本文论述了安然倒闭对公司治理自我监管体系的影响。该案例表明,激励系统中行为者的激励结构对滥用行为的制约远不如许多观察人士所认为的那么强大。尽管学者们已经宣布提高治理标准,但一些标准已经下降,尤其是那些涉及股东价值命理学的标准。文章的调查从安然的商业计划开始。这篇文章断言,安然的“虚拟公司”战略可能比眼看着一家濒临倒闭的公司更有内涵。这篇文章重申了这一策略,将其作为当今微观经济学中盛行的企业不完全契约理论的应用,并断言安然的失败是因为它对股东直接价值的追求导致它错误地应用了经济学,把自己膨胀的股票市值误认为是基本价值。文章接着谈到安然公司的倒闭,讲述了四个因果关系。这种事前描述借鉴了2001年12月迫使安然公司破产的行动者所能获得的信息。本文从股东价值规范和安然公司的企业文化两个方面对安然公司主要负责人的行为进行了解释。最后,本文以公司治理的自我监管制度为例,认为没有必要进行根本性的改革。任何重大新法规的成本都可能超过合规收益,特别是在一个致力于为企业冒险开辟广阔领域的体系中。如果我们寻求高回报,我们必须考虑到理性和声誉有时被证明不足以作为约束的风险。与此同时,我们应该让关键的看门人,特别是审计师,达到很高的专业标准。文章认为,目前关于审计职能的改革讨论没有充分面对本案所显示的俘获问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weaponized Racial Fear Reshaping Third-Party Funding ‘Sports Law’: Implications for the Development of International, Comparative, and National Law and Global Dispute Resolution How the Old World Encountered the New One: Regulatory Competition and Cooperation in European Corporate and Bankruptcy Law Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1