GENETIC DIVERSITY AND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOME BARLEY GENOTYPES FOR NET BLOTCH DISEASE RESISTANCE USING RAPD, SCOT AND SSR MARKERS

S. Dora, M. Mansour, A. A. Aboulila, E. Abdelwahab
{"title":"GENETIC DIVERSITY AND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOME BARLEY GENOTYPES FOR NET BLOTCH DISEASE RESISTANCE USING RAPD, SCOT AND SSR MARKERS","authors":"S. Dora, M. Mansour, A. A. Aboulila, E. Abdelwahab","doi":"10.21608/EJGC.2018.9510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the resistance of some barley genotypes for net blotch disease and grain yield and its related traits, twenty genotypes (12 local varieties and 8 exotic lines) of barley were used. Expression of severity to foliar infection varied between the evaluated genotypes, Giza 117 and Giza 2000 appeared the highest infection response, Giza 123, Giza 124, Giza 126 and Giza 131 were moderately susceptible, while the other genotypes ranged between resistant to moderately resistant. Line 81 and Line 91 proved to be most resistant genotypes for net blotch. Moreover, Giza 133 and line 91 showed superiority in grain yield values over all the tested barley genotypes and high resistance reaction for net blotch disease. Genetic variability and relationships among the used barley genotypes were evaluated by using five RAPD primers, three SCoT primers and eight SSR primer pairs. A high degree of polymorphism was detected with the three types of DNA markers which recorded 70.83, 77.42 and 72.5%, respectively. Alleles number ranged from 8 to 15, 9 to 12 and 2 to 8 per primer, with averages of 9.6, 10.33 and 5 per RAPD, SCoT and SSR primers, respectively. The highest percentage of genetic similarity as revealed by combined RAPD, SCoT and SSR data was found between line 81 and line 91 (90.7%), while the lowest similarity percentage was detected between Giza 124 and line 46 (65.2%). Giza 134 and Line 9 genotypes were resistant for net blotch disease while they gave positive genotype-specific markers with RAPD and SCoT analyses. Only Giza 123 genotype gave a positive genotype-specific marker using SSR analysis. Therefore, these genotype-specific markers could be considered as a molecular marker for net blotch disease response under similar conditions.","PeriodicalId":31811,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Genetics and Cytology","volume":"225 1","pages":"139-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Genetics and Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/EJGC.2018.9510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

To evaluate the resistance of some barley genotypes for net blotch disease and grain yield and its related traits, twenty genotypes (12 local varieties and 8 exotic lines) of barley were used. Expression of severity to foliar infection varied between the evaluated genotypes, Giza 117 and Giza 2000 appeared the highest infection response, Giza 123, Giza 124, Giza 126 and Giza 131 were moderately susceptible, while the other genotypes ranged between resistant to moderately resistant. Line 81 and Line 91 proved to be most resistant genotypes for net blotch. Moreover, Giza 133 and line 91 showed superiority in grain yield values over all the tested barley genotypes and high resistance reaction for net blotch disease. Genetic variability and relationships among the used barley genotypes were evaluated by using five RAPD primers, three SCoT primers and eight SSR primer pairs. A high degree of polymorphism was detected with the three types of DNA markers which recorded 70.83, 77.42 and 72.5%, respectively. Alleles number ranged from 8 to 15, 9 to 12 and 2 to 8 per primer, with averages of 9.6, 10.33 and 5 per RAPD, SCoT and SSR primers, respectively. The highest percentage of genetic similarity as revealed by combined RAPD, SCoT and SSR data was found between line 81 and line 91 (90.7%), while the lowest similarity percentage was detected between Giza 124 and line 46 (65.2%). Giza 134 and Line 9 genotypes were resistant for net blotch disease while they gave positive genotype-specific markers with RAPD and SCoT analyses. Only Giza 123 genotype gave a positive genotype-specific marker using SSR analysis. Therefore, these genotype-specific markers could be considered as a molecular marker for net blotch disease response under similar conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用rapd、Scot和SSR标记分析大麦抗网斑病基因型的遗传多样性及其相互关系
为评价几种大麦基因型对网斑病的抗性和籽粒产量及其相关性状,选用了20个基因型(12个地方品种和8个外来品系)。不同基因型对叶面侵染的表达程度不同,吉萨117和吉萨2000表现出最高的侵染反应,吉萨123、吉萨124、吉萨126和吉萨131表现为中等易感,其他基因型在抗性和中等抗性之间。经证实,81号和91号基因型对网斑病的抗性最强。吉萨133和91系在籽粒产量上具有优势,对网斑病有较高的抗性反应。利用5对RAPD引物、3对SCoT引物和8对SSR引物,分析了大麦基因型间的遗传变异和相互关系。3种DNA标记的多态性程度较高,分别为70.83、77.42和72.5%。每个引物的等位基因数量分别为8 ~ 15、9 ~ 12和2 ~ 8个,平均每个RAPD、SCoT和SSR引物的等位基因数量分别为9.6、10.33和5个。RAPD、SCoT和SSR联合分析表明,81系与91系的遗传相似性最高(90.7%),而吉萨124系与46系的遗传相似性最低(65.2%)。Giza 134和Line 9基因型对净斑病具有抗性,并且通过RAPD和SCoT分析显示基因型特异性标记阳性。SSR分析显示,只有吉萨123基因型有阳性基因型特异性标记。因此,在类似条件下,这些基因型特异性标记可以被认为是网斑病反应的分子标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
TRANSFER OF GLUCANASE GENE TO RESIST LATE BLIGHT DISEASE IN POTATO (Solanum tuberosum L.) ANTIMUTAGENICS EFFECTS OF STIGMASTEROL ON TWO SALT STRESSED Lupinus termis CULTIVARS POTENTIAL EFFECT OF SOME NATURAL FOOD ADDITIVES AGAINST MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE-INDUCED GENOTOXICITY IN Vicia faba ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC COMPONENTS AND GENETIC DIVERSITY OF SIX EGYPTIAN CLOVER (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) GENOTYPES USING ISSR AND URP MARKERS ASSOCIATION OF PNPLA3 (rs738409) AND GCKR (rs1260326) GENE POLYMORPHISMS WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE IN OBESE EGYPTIAN CHILDREN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1