When guilt induces charity: the emotional side of philanthropy

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW European Law Review Pub Date : 2016-11-10 DOI:10.21859/EULAWREV-08064
Ramona De Luca, Mateus Ferreira
{"title":"When guilt induces charity: the emotional side of philanthropy","authors":"Ramona De Luca, Mateus Ferreira","doi":"10.21859/EULAWREV-08064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espite the economic and social changes occurred in Brazil in the last decade, which created a favorable scenario for the prosperity of charitable giving, Brazilian philanthropic landscape still has to deal with some barriers, such as the lack of trust in nonprofit institutions, the absence of incentives for donation, and the change in family and personal values. This article theoretically discusses the phenomenon of philanthropy in Brazil under the guilt hypothesis and comes up with propositions that may inspire future research. We propose that activating a negative emotion, such as guilt, increases individuals’ donation intentions and the intended amount of donation to charitable organizations even more than positive emotions, such as empathy. We also propose that the activation of the emotion of guilt has a stronger effect on individuals that are high (versus low) in consumer materialism value. Finally, we discuss possible theoretical, managerial and public policy implications.","PeriodicalId":45752,"journal":{"name":"European Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21859/EULAWREV-08064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

espite the economic and social changes occurred in Brazil in the last decade, which created a favorable scenario for the prosperity of charitable giving, Brazilian philanthropic landscape still has to deal with some barriers, such as the lack of trust in nonprofit institutions, the absence of incentives for donation, and the change in family and personal values. This article theoretically discusses the phenomenon of philanthropy in Brazil under the guilt hypothesis and comes up with propositions that may inspire future research. We propose that activating a negative emotion, such as guilt, increases individuals’ donation intentions and the intended amount of donation to charitable organizations even more than positive emotions, such as empathy. We also propose that the activation of the emotion of guilt has a stronger effect on individuals that are high (versus low) in consumer materialism value. Finally, we discuss possible theoretical, managerial and public policy implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当内疚诱发慈善:慈善的情感面
尽管巴西在过去十年中发生了经济和社会变化,为慈善捐赠的繁荣创造了有利的环境,但巴西的慈善领域仍然需要处理一些障碍,例如对非营利机构缺乏信任,缺乏捐赠激励,以及家庭和个人价值观的变化。本文在内疚假设下对巴西的慈善现象进行了理论探讨,并提出了一些可能启发未来研究的命题。我们提出,激活消极情绪(如内疚),甚至比积极情绪(如同理心)更能提高个人的捐赠意愿和对慈善组织的预期捐赠数量。我们还提出,内疚感的激活对消费物质主义价值高(相对于低)的个体有更强的影响。最后,我们讨论了可能的理论、管理和公共政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Playing by its own rules? A quantitative empirical analysis of justificatory reasoning in the registered trade mark case law of the European Court of Justice - dataset Beyond Food Safety: EU Food Information Standards as a Facilitator of Political Consumerism and International Law Enforcement Mechanism When Does a Communication to the Public Under EU Copyright Law Need to Be to a ‘New Public’? Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership - Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership: Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1