"Unlocking My Creativity": Teacher Learning in Arts Integration Professional Development.

Patricia Saraniero, M. Goldberg, Brenda S. Hall
{"title":"\"Unlocking My Creativity\": Teacher Learning in Arts Integration Professional Development.","authors":"Patricia Saraniero, M. Goldberg, Brenda S. Hall","doi":"10.21977/D910119060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Saraniero, Patricia; Goldberg, Merryl R; Hall, Brenda | Abstract: This paper examines the impact of two approaches to teacher professional development in arts integration – a summer institute model and a model combining the summer institute with instructional coaching. In an experimental design, the intervention trained third and fourth grade teachers to integrate visual arts and theater into reading curriculum. Findings suggest the coaching plus institute intervention had a greater impact on teacher confidence, use and frequency of arts integration than the institute-only intervention or on the comparison group.Coached teachers reported greater confidence integrating the arts, produced higher-quality work samples, taught more reading concepts with arts integration, implemented more arts standards, and used arts integration more frequently than did the institute-only teachers or the control group teachers. Coached teachers reported in greater numbers about the positive impact the professional development had on their teaching practice, including feeling more creative, inspired and finding greater enjoyment in teaching. Coached teachers were more likely than institute-only teachers to correctly use state VAPA standards and to perceive student progress towards those standards.Institute-only teachers demonstrated greater confidence in and used arts integration more frequently than did the comparison group. However, they did not reach the same levels as the coached teachers and were more likely to report time constraints and other roadblocks to successful implementation.Teachers in both treatment groups reported high student engagement and better expression of learning by students when using arts integration instructional strategies.This project was funded through the U.S. Department of Education Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination program.","PeriodicalId":30083,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Learning through the Arts","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21977/D910119060","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Learning through the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21977/D910119060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Author(s): Saraniero, Patricia; Goldberg, Merryl R; Hall, Brenda | Abstract: This paper examines the impact of two approaches to teacher professional development in arts integration – a summer institute model and a model combining the summer institute with instructional coaching. In an experimental design, the intervention trained third and fourth grade teachers to integrate visual arts and theater into reading curriculum. Findings suggest the coaching plus institute intervention had a greater impact on teacher confidence, use and frequency of arts integration than the institute-only intervention or on the comparison group.Coached teachers reported greater confidence integrating the arts, produced higher-quality work samples, taught more reading concepts with arts integration, implemented more arts standards, and used arts integration more frequently than did the institute-only teachers or the control group teachers. Coached teachers reported in greater numbers about the positive impact the professional development had on their teaching practice, including feeling more creative, inspired and finding greater enjoyment in teaching. Coached teachers were more likely than institute-only teachers to correctly use state VAPA standards and to perceive student progress towards those standards.Institute-only teachers demonstrated greater confidence in and used arts integration more frequently than did the comparison group. However, they did not reach the same levels as the coached teachers and were more likely to report time constraints and other roadblocks to successful implementation.Teachers in both treatment groups reported high student engagement and better expression of learning by students when using arts integration instructional strategies.This project was funded through the U.S. Department of Education Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“释放我的创造力”:艺术整合专业发展中的教师学习。
作者:Saraniero, Patricia;梅里尔·R·戈德堡;摘要:本文考察了两种方法对艺术整合中教师专业发展的影响——暑期学院模式和暑期学院与教学辅导相结合的模式。在实验设计中,干预训练三年级和四年级教师将视觉艺术和戏剧融入阅读课程。研究结果表明,教练加学院干预对教师信心、艺术整合的使用和频率的影响大于学院干预或对照组。与学院教师或对照组教师相比,接受过培训的教师对整合艺术更有信心,产生了更高质量的工作样本,用艺术整合教授了更多的阅读概念,实施了更多的艺术标准,并更频繁地使用艺术整合。接受过培训的教师报告称,专业发展对他们的教学实践产生了更多的积极影响,包括感觉更有创造力、更有灵感、更享受教学。经过培训的教师比学院教师更有可能正确使用州VAPA标准,并感知学生在这些标准方面的进步。与对照组相比,学院教师表现出更大的信心,也更频繁地使用艺术整合。然而,他们没有达到与指导教师相同的水平,并且更有可能报告时间限制和其他成功实施的障碍。两个治疗组的教师都报告说,当使用艺术整合教学策略时,学生的参与度高,学习表现更好。该项目由美国教育部艺术教育模式发展和传播项目资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
2022 Foreword Art Infused Literacy: Scaffolding the Writing Process with with Visual Strategies Arts Infusion: My Lived Experiences as an Elementary Visual Arts Teacher The Combined Use of Metformin and Methotrexate in Psoriasis Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. It got me back to science and now I want to be a plant scientist: Arts-integrated science engagement for middle school girls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1