Ethnic self-identity: a comparison of ingroup evaluations.

Sociometry Pub Date : 1976-06-01 DOI:10.2307/2786213
L. Driedger
{"title":"Ethnic self-identity: a comparison of ingroup evaluations.","authors":"L. Driedger","doi":"10.2307/2786213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to define and explain various expressions of ethnicity by the use of an inventory designed to measure degrees of self-identity with respect to ingroup affirmation, ingroup denial, ideal self-identity, and real self-identity. A comparison of seven Winnipeg ethnic groups in relation to these factors indicated strong ingroup affirmation among the French and the Jews and a low degree of ingroup affirmation among British, Scandinavian and Polish groups. French and Jewish institutional completeness seemed to be mainly responsible for the groups' strong ethnic identification and solidarity. High social status and identification with dominant charter groups appeared to be responsible for the low degree of ethnic denial found among British, Scandinavian and French groups. The results supported Lewin's thesis that individuals need a firm clear sense of identification with an ethnic or majority culture in order to find a secure basis for a sense of well-being.","PeriodicalId":76949,"journal":{"name":"Sociometry","volume":"39 2 1","pages":"131-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2786213","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2786213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to define and explain various expressions of ethnicity by the use of an inventory designed to measure degrees of self-identity with respect to ingroup affirmation, ingroup denial, ideal self-identity, and real self-identity. A comparison of seven Winnipeg ethnic groups in relation to these factors indicated strong ingroup affirmation among the French and the Jews and a low degree of ingroup affirmation among British, Scandinavian and Polish groups. French and Jewish institutional completeness seemed to be mainly responsible for the groups' strong ethnic identification and solidarity. High social status and identification with dominant charter groups appeared to be responsible for the low degree of ethnic denial found among British, Scandinavian and French groups. The results supported Lewin's thesis that individuals need a firm clear sense of identification with an ethnic or majority culture in order to find a secure basis for a sense of well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
族群自我认同:群体内评价的比较。
本研究的目的是通过使用一份量表来定义和解释种族的各种表达,该量表旨在衡量自我认同的程度,包括群体内肯定、群体内否认、理想自我认同和真实自我认同。对温尼伯七个族群与这些因素的关系的比较表明,法国人和犹太人的群体内肯定程度很高,而英国人、斯堪的纳维亚人和波兰人的群体内肯定程度较低。法国和犹太人的制度完整性似乎是这些群体强烈的种族认同和团结的主要原因。较高的社会地位和对主要特许团体的认同似乎是英国、斯堪的纳维亚和法国团体中种族否认程度较低的原因。研究结果支持了Lewin的论点,即个人需要对种族或多数文化有一种坚定明确的认同感,以便为幸福感找到一个安全的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The obnoxious and the nice: some sociological consequences of two psychological types. Self-disclosure to same- and opposite-sex parents: an empirical test of insights from role theory. The obnoxious and the nice: some sociological consequences of two psychological types. Self-disclosure to same- and opposite-sex parents: an empirical test of insights from role theory. The effects of interaction distance and gender on self-disclosure in the dyad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1