Impact of stringent tolerance criteria on verification of absorbed dose distributions and evaluation through inhomogeneous media

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/ntrp2202138o
N. Obajdin, Djeni Smilovic-Radojcic, David Rajlić, Manda Švabić-Kolacio, S. Jurković
{"title":"Impact of stringent tolerance criteria on verification of absorbed dose distributions and evaluation through inhomogeneous media","authors":"N. Obajdin, Djeni Smilovic-Radojcic, David Rajlić, Manda Švabić-Kolacio, S. Jurković","doi":"10.2298/ntrp2202138o","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances of radiation delivery devices have increased the complexity of the radiation oncology treatments. Herewith, outcome of the treatment, as well as patient safety, strongly depend on the consistency of absorbed dose delivery. Both can be ensured by comprehensive system of verification of calculated absorbed dose distributions. Standard method is evaluation of calculated absorbed dose distribution according to gamma method, using a 2-D detector and a homogeneous phantom, to obtain measured dose distribution. Purpose of this research was to investigate the influence of tolerance criteria on gamma passing rate. Additionally, the agreement in heterogeneous phantom was analysed. Absorbed dose calculations were performed using systems Monaco and XiO. Detector with 1020 ionization chambers in homogeneous phantom and semi-anthropomorphic phantom was used for measurements. Absorbed dose distributions of around 3500 patients were analysed using gamma method. In homogeneous phantom, average gamma passing rates were within tolerance for 3 %/2 mm. For measurements in heterogeneous media, the highest average gamma passing rate was obtained for small volumes of medium treatment complexity (??=93.84%), while large volumes of treatment with low complexity yielded the lowest gamma passing rates (??= 83.22%).","PeriodicalId":49734,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ntrp2202138o","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances of radiation delivery devices have increased the complexity of the radiation oncology treatments. Herewith, outcome of the treatment, as well as patient safety, strongly depend on the consistency of absorbed dose delivery. Both can be ensured by comprehensive system of verification of calculated absorbed dose distributions. Standard method is evaluation of calculated absorbed dose distribution according to gamma method, using a 2-D detector and a homogeneous phantom, to obtain measured dose distribution. Purpose of this research was to investigate the influence of tolerance criteria on gamma passing rate. Additionally, the agreement in heterogeneous phantom was analysed. Absorbed dose calculations were performed using systems Monaco and XiO. Detector with 1020 ionization chambers in homogeneous phantom and semi-anthropomorphic phantom was used for measurements. Absorbed dose distributions of around 3500 patients were analysed using gamma method. In homogeneous phantom, average gamma passing rates were within tolerance for 3 %/2 mm. For measurements in heterogeneous media, the highest average gamma passing rate was obtained for small volumes of medium treatment complexity (??=93.84%), while large volumes of treatment with low complexity yielded the lowest gamma passing rates (??= 83.22%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严格的耐受标准对非均匀介质吸收剂量分布验证和评价的影响
放射输送设备的进步增加了肿瘤放射治疗的复杂性。因此,治疗的结果以及患者的安全性在很大程度上取决于吸收剂量递送的一致性。两者都可以通过计算吸收剂量分布的综合验证系统来保证。标准方法是利用二维探测器和均匀模体,根据伽玛法对计算出的吸收剂量分布进行评价,得到测量到的剂量分布。本研究的目的是探讨容忍标准对伽玛通过率的影响。此外,还分析了异质幻影的一致性。吸收剂量计算采用摩纳哥和XiO系统。采用均匀型和半拟人型两种结构的1020个电离室探测器进行测量。用伽玛法分析了3500例患者的吸收剂量分布。在均匀幻相中,平均伽马通过率在3% / 2mm的公差范围内。对于非均质介质的测量,中等处理复杂度的小体积平均伽马通过率最高(=93.84%),而低复杂度的大体积处理的伽马通过率最低(??= 83.22%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection
Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
41.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection is an international scientific journal covering the wide range of disciplines involved in nuclear science and technology as well as in the field of radiation protection. The journal is open for scientific papers, short papers, review articles, and technical papers dealing with nuclear power, research reactors, accelerators, nuclear materials, waste management, radiation measurements, and environmental problems. However, basic reactor physics and design, particle and radiation transport theory, and development of numerical methods and codes will also be important aspects of the editorial policy.
期刊最新文献
Study on kinetic parameters of pebble bed reactor with TRISO duplex fuel Influence of electromagnetic pollution of the electron beam generator and high-energy radioactive source on the memory components Influence of ionizing radiation on the stochasticity of overvoltage protection at low, medium, and high voltage levels in gas surge arresters Assessing radiation hazards associated with natural radioactivity in building materials in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Study on occupational exposure of medical staff caused by induced radioactivity in the treatment room of medical heavy-ion facility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1