Executive Privilege Revived?: Secrecy and Conflict During the Bush Presidency

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Duke Law Journal Pub Date : 2002-11-01 DOI:10.2307/1373175
Mark J. Rozell
{"title":"Executive Privilege Revived?: Secrecy and Conflict During the Bush Presidency","authors":"Mark J. Rozell","doi":"10.2307/1373175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although well established now as a legitimate presidential power, executive privilege remains controversial. Executive privilege is controversial in part because some presidents have overreached in exercising this authority. Presidential attempts to conceal evidence of wrongdoing during the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard Nixon’s resignation and during the scandal that led to President Bill Clinton’s impeachment gave executive privilege a bad name. The phrase “executive privilege” does not appear in the Constitution. To be precise, that phrase was not a part of the common language until President Eisenhower’s administration, leading some to suggest that executive privilege therefore cannot be constitutional. These semantic, textualist challenges to executive privilege’s constitutionality fail when viewed through a broader, historical lens of past","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"403-421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1373175","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1373175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Although well established now as a legitimate presidential power, executive privilege remains controversial. Executive privilege is controversial in part because some presidents have overreached in exercising this authority. Presidential attempts to conceal evidence of wrongdoing during the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard Nixon’s resignation and during the scandal that led to President Bill Clinton’s impeachment gave executive privilege a bad name. The phrase “executive privilege” does not appear in the Constitution. To be precise, that phrase was not a part of the common language until President Eisenhower’s administration, leading some to suggest that executive privilege therefore cannot be constitutional. These semantic, textualist challenges to executive privilege’s constitutionality fail when viewed through a broader, historical lens of past
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恢复行政特权?:布什总统任期内的秘密与冲突
虽然行政特权现在已经确立为合法的总统权力,但仍然存在争议。行政特权存在争议,部分原因是一些总统在行使这一权力时越权了。在导致理查德·尼克松总统辞职的水门事件和导致比尔·克林顿总统被弹劾的丑闻期间,总统试图掩盖不法行为的证据,这给行政特权带来了坏名声。“行政特权”一词并没有出现在宪法中。准确地说,在艾森豪威尔总统执政之前,这句话并不是通用语言的一部分,导致一些人认为行政特权因此不符合宪法。这些对行政特权合宪性的语义性、文本主义的挑战,如果从更广泛的历史视角来看,就会失败
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The first issue of what was to become the Duke Law Journal was published in March 1951 as the Duke Bar Journal. Created to provide a medium for student expression, the Duke Bar Journal consisted entirely of student-written and student-edited work until 1953, when it began publishing faculty contributions. To reflect the inclusion of faculty scholarship, the Duke Bar Journal became the Duke Law Journal in 1957. In 1969, the Journal published its inaugural Administrative Law Symposium issue, a tradition that continues today. Volume 1 of the Duke Bar Journal spanned two issues and 259 pages. In 1959, the Journal grew to four issues and 649 pages, growing again in 1970 to six issues and 1263 pages. Today, the Duke Law Journal publishes eight issues per volume. Our staff is committed to the purpose set forth in our constitution: to publish legal writing of superior quality. We seek to publish a collection of outstanding scholarship from established legal writers, up-and-coming authors, and our own student editors.
期刊最新文献
The Gorsuch Test: Gundy v. United States, Limiting the Administrative State, and the Future of Nondelegation Stem cell injections for axial back pain: a systematic review of associated risks and complications with a case illustration of diffuse hyperplastic gliosis resulting in cauda equina syndrome. Radiological and clinical predictors of scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I and spinal cord syrinx from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium. Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance. Prescription Drug Policing: The Right to Health Information Privacy Pre- and Post-Carpenter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1