On the outside Seeking In: Must Intervenors Demonstrate Standing to Join a Lawsuit?

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Duke Law Journal Pub Date : 2002-11-01 DOI:10.2307/1373177
J. Karastelev
{"title":"On the outside Seeking In: Must Intervenors Demonstrate Standing to Join a Lawsuit?","authors":"J. Karastelev","doi":"10.2307/1373177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The law's traditional conception of a \"case\" has evolved from a discrete dispute between two adverse parties to a multiparty structure covering a range of related and often conflicting interests.' The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide several avenues for expanding the involved participants in a case beyond a single plaintiff and single defendant to include other affected or interested parties.2 Intervention under Rule 24 is the vehicle nonparties use to protect their interests from potential impairment by a court's adjudication of a dispute between the original parties. By allowing nonparties to intervene, Rule 24 lets them represent their interests and arguably improves the court's decisionmaking by allowing the presentation of different viewpoints and evidence.3 Courts may also benefit from granting mo-","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"136 1","pages":"455-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1373177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1373177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The law's traditional conception of a "case" has evolved from a discrete dispute between two adverse parties to a multiparty structure covering a range of related and often conflicting interests.' The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide several avenues for expanding the involved participants in a case beyond a single plaintiff and single defendant to include other affected or interested parties.2 Intervention under Rule 24 is the vehicle nonparties use to protect their interests from potential impairment by a court's adjudication of a dispute between the original parties. By allowing nonparties to intervene, Rule 24 lets them represent their interests and arguably improves the court's decisionmaking by allowing the presentation of different viewpoints and evidence.3 Courts may also benefit from granting mo-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从外部寻求介入:介入者必须证明其参与诉讼的资格吗?
法律对“案件”的传统概念已经从两个敌对方之间的离散争议演变为涵盖一系列相关且经常相互冲突的利益的多方结构。《联邦民事诉讼规则》提供了几种途径来扩大案件中涉及的参与人,使其超越单一的原告和被告,而包括其他受影响的或利害关系人第24条规则下的干预是指非当事人使用的工具,以保护他们的利益免受法院对原当事人之间的争议裁决的潜在损害。通过允许非当事人介入,规则24允许他们代表自己的利益,并且可以通过允许提出不同的观点和证据来改善法院的决策法院也可以从授予mo-中获益
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The first issue of what was to become the Duke Law Journal was published in March 1951 as the Duke Bar Journal. Created to provide a medium for student expression, the Duke Bar Journal consisted entirely of student-written and student-edited work until 1953, when it began publishing faculty contributions. To reflect the inclusion of faculty scholarship, the Duke Bar Journal became the Duke Law Journal in 1957. In 1969, the Journal published its inaugural Administrative Law Symposium issue, a tradition that continues today. Volume 1 of the Duke Bar Journal spanned two issues and 259 pages. In 1959, the Journal grew to four issues and 649 pages, growing again in 1970 to six issues and 1263 pages. Today, the Duke Law Journal publishes eight issues per volume. Our staff is committed to the purpose set forth in our constitution: to publish legal writing of superior quality. We seek to publish a collection of outstanding scholarship from established legal writers, up-and-coming authors, and our own student editors.
期刊最新文献
The Gorsuch Test: Gundy v. United States, Limiting the Administrative State, and the Future of Nondelegation Stem cell injections for axial back pain: a systematic review of associated risks and complications with a case illustration of diffuse hyperplastic gliosis resulting in cauda equina syndrome. Radiological and clinical predictors of scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I and spinal cord syrinx from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium. Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance. Prescription Drug Policing: The Right to Health Information Privacy Pre- and Post-Carpenter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1