A Notice to Novices: What Can We Learn from "How Should I Know?": A Book Review of How Should I Know? Pre-service Teachers' Images of Knowing by Heart in Mathematics and Science

Q4 Social Sciences Journal of Urban Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2015-07-30 DOI:10.21423/jume-v8i1a269
Alexia Mintos
{"title":"A Notice to Novices: What Can We Learn from \"How Should I Know?\": A Book Review of How Should I Know? Pre-service Teachers' Images of Knowing by Heart in Mathematics and Science","authors":"Alexia Mintos","doi":"10.21423/jume-v8i1a269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"athleen Nolan’s (2007) book, How Should I Know? Preservice Teachers’ Images of Knowing by Heart in Mathematics and Science, is a “critical qualitative study of mathematics and science epistemologies” (p. 33), particularly preservice elementary teachers’ (PSETs) views of what it means to know mathematics and science. In this book, Nolan uses data from individual and focus group interviews and observations to describe the experiences of PSETs as both learners and future teachers. As Nolan suggests, the main point of this book is, “that this research is not about the content of the subjects so much as it is about the preservice teachers’ perceptions of, and experiences in knowing in these subject areas” (p. 32). She seeks to understand how and why these perceptions and experiences come about. Nolan uses these experiences to critique the conditions and epistemologies that exclude some groups of learners from fully engaging in mathematics and science learning and proposes alternative ways of teaching and learning mathematics and science. Nolan uses multiple voices and perspectives in this work, including those of the participants, colleagues, and other scholars from a variety of disciplines (e.g., education, psychology, social sciences, and visual arts) to discuss methodological choices and broader epistemological issues. She leverages these voices to interrogate what it means to learn and teach mathematics and science and proposes alternatives to commonly accepted norms and practices in mathematics and science education. The participants’ perspectives are used to frame a vision for helping all preservice teachers (PSTs) to experience success in teaching and learning mathe-","PeriodicalId":36435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v8i1a269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

athleen Nolan’s (2007) book, How Should I Know? Preservice Teachers’ Images of Knowing by Heart in Mathematics and Science, is a “critical qualitative study of mathematics and science epistemologies” (p. 33), particularly preservice elementary teachers’ (PSETs) views of what it means to know mathematics and science. In this book, Nolan uses data from individual and focus group interviews and observations to describe the experiences of PSETs as both learners and future teachers. As Nolan suggests, the main point of this book is, “that this research is not about the content of the subjects so much as it is about the preservice teachers’ perceptions of, and experiences in knowing in these subject areas” (p. 32). She seeks to understand how and why these perceptions and experiences come about. Nolan uses these experiences to critique the conditions and epistemologies that exclude some groups of learners from fully engaging in mathematics and science learning and proposes alternative ways of teaching and learning mathematics and science. Nolan uses multiple voices and perspectives in this work, including those of the participants, colleagues, and other scholars from a variety of disciplines (e.g., education, psychology, social sciences, and visual arts) to discuss methodological choices and broader epistemological issues. She leverages these voices to interrogate what it means to learn and teach mathematics and science and proposes alternatives to commonly accepted norms and practices in mathematics and science education. The participants’ perspectives are used to frame a vision for helping all preservice teachers (PSTs) to experience success in teaching and learning mathe-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
给新手的通知:从“我该如何知道”中学到什么?:书评《我该如何知道?》职前教师在数学与科学领域的“用心认知”形象
运动员诺兰(2007)的书《我怎么知道?》《职前教师在数学和科学中用心知识的形象》是“对数学和科学认识论的批判性定性研究”(第33页),特别是职前小学教师(pset)对了解数学和科学意味着什么的看法。在这本书中,诺兰使用了来自个人和焦点小组访谈和观察的数据来描述pset作为学习者和未来教师的经历。正如诺兰所说,这本书的主要观点是,“这项研究与其说是关于这些学科的内容,不如说是关于职前教师对这些学科领域的认知和经验”(第32页)。她试图理解这些感知和经历是如何以及为什么产生的。诺兰利用这些经验来批判那些将一些学习者群体排除在数学和科学学习之外的条件和认识论,并提出了数学和科学教学的替代方法。诺兰在这部作品中使用了多种声音和视角,包括参与者、同事和来自不同学科(如教育、心理学、社会科学和视觉艺术)的其他学者的声音和视角,来讨论方法论选择和更广泛的认识论问题。她利用这些声音来质疑学习和教授数学和科学的意义,并提出了数学和科学教育中普遍接受的规范和实践的替代方案。参与者的观点被用来构建一个愿景,以帮助所有职前教师(pst)体验教学和学习数学的成功
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trip to Guatemala The Role of Technology in Enhancing Urban Mathematics Education Educational Aspirations of Diverse Groups among Undergraduate Statistics Majors Integration of ethnomathematics in teaching geometry: a systematic review and bibliometric report Design Considerations for Facilitating Equitable Participation in an Ethical Data Science Course for High School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1