A New Demand for Muslim Reservations in India

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Asian Survey Pub Date : 1997-09-01 DOI:10.2307/2645702
T. Wright
{"title":"A New Demand for Muslim Reservations in India","authors":"T. Wright","doi":"10.2307/2645702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"against so-called affirmative action quotas for minorities, India has been broadening the categories of people eligible for preferential treatment. This paper will focus on the attempts of some Muslim leaders, abetted by Congress Party politicians seeking to recover their lost Muslim vote bank, to climb aboard the reservations bandwagon in the context of India's highly competitive electoral system. Communal, that is, religious, quotas are burdened by an especially dangerous history in 20th century India. On the argument that this \"former ruling elite minority\" had fallen behind the Hindu majority in accepting modem education, the British colonial authorities awarded Muslims reserved seats in legislatures in 1909, and in 1926 separate electorates and a 25% quota in civil service were provided to reflect their 24% of the population. There is good evidence that these gestures were actually intended to perpetuate British rule by the classic strategy of divide and rule, and separate electorates certainly encouraged communal appeals to voters of the minority community. Another fairly direct result can be traced to the Pakistan Resolution of 1940 and parti","PeriodicalId":47691,"journal":{"name":"Asian Survey","volume":"37 1","pages":"852-858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2645702","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Survey","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2645702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

against so-called affirmative action quotas for minorities, India has been broadening the categories of people eligible for preferential treatment. This paper will focus on the attempts of some Muslim leaders, abetted by Congress Party politicians seeking to recover their lost Muslim vote bank, to climb aboard the reservations bandwagon in the context of India's highly competitive electoral system. Communal, that is, religious, quotas are burdened by an especially dangerous history in 20th century India. On the argument that this "former ruling elite minority" had fallen behind the Hindu majority in accepting modem education, the British colonial authorities awarded Muslims reserved seats in legislatures in 1909, and in 1926 separate electorates and a 25% quota in civil service were provided to reflect their 24% of the population. There is good evidence that these gestures were actually intended to perpetuate British rule by the classic strategy of divide and rule, and separate electorates certainly encouraged communal appeals to voters of the minority community. Another fairly direct result can be traced to the Pakistan Resolution of 1940 and parti
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度对穆斯林保留地的新要求
反对所谓的少数民族平权行动配额,印度一直在扩大有资格享受优惠待遇的人的类别。本文将重点关注在印度竞争激烈的选举制度背景下,一些穆斯林领导人在国大党政客的唆使下,试图恢复失去的穆斯林选票库,从而登上预留制的潮流。在20世纪的印度,社区,也就是宗教,配额背负着一段特别危险的历史。英国殖民当局认为这一“前统治精英少数”在接受现代教育方面落后于大多数印度教徒,因此在1909年授予穆斯林在立法机构的保留席位,并在1926年提供单独的选民和25%的公务员配额,以反映他们占24%的人口。有充分的证据表明,这些姿态实际上是为了通过分而治之的经典策略来延续英国的统治,而分开的选民当然鼓励了对少数民族选民的共同呼吁。另一个相当直接的结果可以追溯到1940年的巴基斯坦决议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Survey
Asian Survey AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The only academic journal of its kind produced in the United States, Asian Survey provides a comprehensive retrospective of contemporary international relations within South, Southeast, and East Asian nations. As the Asian community’s matrix of activities becomes increasingly complex, it is essential to have a sourcebook for sound analysis of current events, governmental policies, socio-economic development, and financial institutions. In Asian Survey you’ll find that sourcebook. Asian Survey consistently publishes articles by leading American and foreign scholars, whose views supplement and contest meanings disseminated by the media.
期刊最新文献
Balance-Minded Voting in Post-2012 Japan Deceptive Gender Equality How Has the War in Ukraine Shaped Taiwanese Concerns about Their Own Defense? Cleaning Up Its Act Electoral System Reform and the Politics of Policy Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1