{"title":"Plowshares and Swords: Clerical Involvement in Acts of Violence and Peacemaking in Late Medieval England, C. 1400-1536*","authors":"D. Thiery","doi":"10.2307/4054213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“My men should use their swords and bucklers…but if John Stanshaw is in one alehouse then I will be in another.” To historians of medieval and Reformation England, these lines should not be all that surprising. Throughout the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, the heyday of livery and maintenance, ritualized effrontery was in vogue among the affluent and they often employed large retinues of armed servants as signs of potency and prestige. However, it may surprise some to learn that the above statement was uttered by a priest, Geoffrey Elys, vicar of Thatcham (Berks.), around the beginning of the sixteenth century. Though the medieval Church tirelessly struggled to convince its flock of the wickedness of interpersonal aggression, its own servants were not immune to bouts of conflict and strife. As R. N. Swanson cautions in his study of parish priests, the clergy “can be considered as a group; but they were also individuals who created their own careers and had their own personal relations with their parishioners.” Indeed, the conduct of clerics in their parish communities, especially their violent conduct, can be quite baffling if one only evaluates it by the criteria of ecclesiastical proscription and fails to recognize that such proscription was just one thick strand of an intricate web of relations and expectations. In his examination of thirteenth-century parish priesthood, J. Goering has traced the transition of pastors from merely members of the village to semi-detached individuals who were compelled to abide by both village customs and the values of a more unified and doctrinally authoritative Church.","PeriodicalId":80407,"journal":{"name":"Albion","volume":"36 1","pages":"201-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4054213","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4054213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
“My men should use their swords and bucklers…but if John Stanshaw is in one alehouse then I will be in another.” To historians of medieval and Reformation England, these lines should not be all that surprising. Throughout the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, the heyday of livery and maintenance, ritualized effrontery was in vogue among the affluent and they often employed large retinues of armed servants as signs of potency and prestige. However, it may surprise some to learn that the above statement was uttered by a priest, Geoffrey Elys, vicar of Thatcham (Berks.), around the beginning of the sixteenth century. Though the medieval Church tirelessly struggled to convince its flock of the wickedness of interpersonal aggression, its own servants were not immune to bouts of conflict and strife. As R. N. Swanson cautions in his study of parish priests, the clergy “can be considered as a group; but they were also individuals who created their own careers and had their own personal relations with their parishioners.” Indeed, the conduct of clerics in their parish communities, especially their violent conduct, can be quite baffling if one only evaluates it by the criteria of ecclesiastical proscription and fails to recognize that such proscription was just one thick strand of an intricate web of relations and expectations. In his examination of thirteenth-century parish priesthood, J. Goering has traced the transition of pastors from merely members of the village to semi-detached individuals who were compelled to abide by both village customs and the values of a more unified and doctrinally authoritative Church.
“我的人应该用剑和盾牌……但如果约翰·斯坦肖在一家酒店,那我也会去另一家。”对于中世纪和宗教改革时期英格兰的历史学家来说,这些诗句并不奇怪。在15世纪到16世纪早期,这是制服和保养的全盛时期,仪式化的厚颜无耻在富人中很流行,他们经常雇佣大批武装仆人作为权力和威望的标志。然而,可能会让一些人感到惊讶的是,上述说法是由一位牧师杰弗里·埃利斯说的,他是撒查姆(伯克郡)的教区牧师,大约在16世纪初。尽管中世纪教会孜孜不倦地努力使其信徒相信人际攻击的邪恶,但它自己的仆人也不能幸免于冲突和争斗。正如r·n·斯旺森(R. N. Swanson)在他对教区牧师的研究中警告的那样,神职人员“可以被视为一个群体;但他们也是独立的个体,他们创造了自己的事业,并与教区居民建立了自己的个人关系。”事实上,神职人员在教区社区的行为,特别是他们的暴力行为,如果只以教会禁制的标准来评估,而没有认识到这种禁制只是错综复杂的关系和期望网络中的一根粗细的线,就会非常令人费解。在他对13世纪教区神职人员的考察中,J. Goering追溯了牧师从仅仅是村庄成员到半独立的个人的转变,他们被迫遵守村庄习俗和更统一的教义权威教会的价值观。