Heretic Hunting beyond the Seas: John Brett and His Encounter with the Marian Exiles

Albion Pub Date : 2004-09-22 DOI:10.2307/4054366
S. Covington
{"title":"Heretic Hunting beyond the Seas: John Brett and His Encounter with the Marian Exiles","authors":"S. Covington","doi":"10.2307/4054366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The story of beleaguered Protestants who fled to the continent during the reign of Mary Tudor in the 1550s is well-known, but less familiar is the attempt by the queen and her representatives to order some of those exiles apprehended and brought back home for confrontation or punishment. One agent placed in charge of tracking down a few of the more prominent exiles and serving them with papers was John Brett: over the course of several months, in which he himself was pursued, insulted, beaten, and ultimately chased from Frankfurt and Strasbourg by protestant sympathizers, Brett persisted in his attempt to reach figures such as Katherine, the godly duchess of Suffolk, and her family; the result however was utter failure, described in an account of the tribulations written by Brett himself after his empty-handed return to England.' Brett's adventure constitutes a tale of drama in its own right, but more important are aspects within the narrative that illuminate larger issues of the law, jurisdiction, exile, and strategies of resistance on the part of a community growing more confident and intellectually justified in its opposition to the queen (and her agent). Not only does Brett's narrative capture a tense moment in the lives of notable Marian exiles with a vividness and intimacy that supercedes other exile accounts;2 even more, it unwittingly provides a complete portrait, at a specific and significant moment in time, of a community that is self-sustaining yet fearful, and one that directly relates in its behavior to resistance tracts such as fellow exile John Ponet's Treatise of Politike Power, written in the same year as Brett's visit. At the same time, Mary's decision to dispatch Brett overseas was not necessarily outside the law either, and neither was it especially persecutory in the larger context of Tudor behavior over the course of the sixteenth century. Brett's attempt to deliver his letters to a select list of exiles was simply an attempt to assert Crown privilege over wayward (indeed, politically dangerous) subjects, in an age when legal understandings-specifically concerning land law and international law-were undergoing profound transformations, and","PeriodicalId":80407,"journal":{"name":"Albion","volume":"36 1","pages":"407-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4054366","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4054366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The story of beleaguered Protestants who fled to the continent during the reign of Mary Tudor in the 1550s is well-known, but less familiar is the attempt by the queen and her representatives to order some of those exiles apprehended and brought back home for confrontation or punishment. One agent placed in charge of tracking down a few of the more prominent exiles and serving them with papers was John Brett: over the course of several months, in which he himself was pursued, insulted, beaten, and ultimately chased from Frankfurt and Strasbourg by protestant sympathizers, Brett persisted in his attempt to reach figures such as Katherine, the godly duchess of Suffolk, and her family; the result however was utter failure, described in an account of the tribulations written by Brett himself after his empty-handed return to England.' Brett's adventure constitutes a tale of drama in its own right, but more important are aspects within the narrative that illuminate larger issues of the law, jurisdiction, exile, and strategies of resistance on the part of a community growing more confident and intellectually justified in its opposition to the queen (and her agent). Not only does Brett's narrative capture a tense moment in the lives of notable Marian exiles with a vividness and intimacy that supercedes other exile accounts;2 even more, it unwittingly provides a complete portrait, at a specific and significant moment in time, of a community that is self-sustaining yet fearful, and one that directly relates in its behavior to resistance tracts such as fellow exile John Ponet's Treatise of Politike Power, written in the same year as Brett's visit. At the same time, Mary's decision to dispatch Brett overseas was not necessarily outside the law either, and neither was it especially persecutory in the larger context of Tudor behavior over the course of the sixteenth century. Brett's attempt to deliver his letters to a select list of exiles was simply an attempt to assert Crown privilege over wayward (indeed, politically dangerous) subjects, in an age when legal understandings-specifically concerning land law and international law-were undergoing profound transformations, and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海外异端狩猎:约翰·布雷特和他与玛丽安流亡者的遭遇
1550年代玛丽·都铎统治时期,被围困的新教徒逃到欧洲大陆的故事众所周知,但不太为人所知的是,女王和她的代表试图下令逮捕一些流亡者,并将其带回国内进行对抗或惩罚。约翰·布雷特(John Brett)是一位负责追踪一些较为显赫的流放者并向他们提供文件的特工。在几个月的时间里,布雷特自己被新教同情者追捕、侮辱、殴打,最终被赶出法兰克福和斯特拉斯堡,布雷特坚持试图接触萨福克郡虔诚的公爵夫人凯瑟琳(Katherine)及其家人等人物;然而,结果是彻底的失败,布雷特自己在空手回到英国后写下了他的苦难经历。布雷特的冒险本身就构成了一个戏剧性的故事,但更重要的是,故事中的一些方面阐明了更大的问题,如法律、司法、流放和一个社区的抵抗策略,这个社区越来越自信,越来越理智地反对女王(和她的代理人)。布雷特的叙述不仅捕获一个紧张的时刻在著名的玛丽安流亡者的生活生动和亲密,取代其他流亡账户;2更,它无意中提供了一个完整的肖像,在一个特定的和重要的时刻,虽然害怕,却自我维持的一个社区,和一个直接相关的行为等阻力大片的流亡Politike力量的约翰Ponet的专著,写在同年布雷特的访问。同时,玛丽将布雷特流放海外的决定也不一定违反法律,在16世纪都铎王朝的大背景下,这也不是特别的迫害。布雷特试图将他的信件交给一份精选的流亡者名单,这仅仅是在一个法律理解——特别是关于土地法和国际法——正在经历深刻变革的时代,对任性的(实际上是政治上危险的)臣民维护王室特权的一种尝试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chelsea Watego: foregrounding Indigenous intellectual sovereignty. "Affective Adjectives"の歴史的発達と使用頻度 --Aphra Behn, Jane Austen, Virginia Woolf, Hannah Moreの形容詞Lovelyを中心に Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health promotion programs for the prevention and management of chronic diseases: a scoping review protocol. On ways of knowing in medicine. Gender, medicine, and consumer culture in Victorian England: creating the kleptomaniac.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1