Depth of Cure and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Posterior Dental Composites

Saamah An, Said As, N. A. Yahya
{"title":"Depth of Cure and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Posterior Dental Composites","authors":"Saamah An, Said As, N. A. Yahya","doi":"10.22452/ADUM.VOL23NO1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study were to compare the microhardness, flexural strength and compressive strength of a new bulk-fill composite (SonicFill™) to a conventional nanohybrid composite (Herculite Precis) and an established bulk-fill composite (Tetric N Ceram). In addition, the depth of cure of the two bulk-fill resin composites was also investigated. The materials were prepared and tested for the mechanical properties following ISO 4049:2009. Microhardness and depth of cure were measured using Vickers hardness tester. Compressive and flexural strength were tested using a universal testing machine. To determine the depth of cure, microhardness of the bulk-fill composites were measured as a function of selected depth of materials at 0.5 mm, 2.0 mm and 4.0 mm. Data were analyzed by either one-way ANOVA or Friedman test. Analysis demonstrated that SonicFill™ gave the highest microhardness value (101.8 + 4.6 VHN) compared to the other two groups. There were no significant differences among all groups in flexural and compressive strength. The depth of cure decreased as the thickness of both bulk-fill composites increased. In conclusion, SonicFill™ showed favorable mechanical properties compared to other composites tested. In both bulk-filled groups, microhardness value decreased as the thickness of the composite increased. The polymerization of the bulk-filled composites was effective only at 2 mm or less.","PeriodicalId":75515,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dentistry","volume":"23 1","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/ADUM.VOL23NO1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare the microhardness, flexural strength and compressive strength of a new bulk-fill composite (SonicFill™) to a conventional nanohybrid composite (Herculite Precis) and an established bulk-fill composite (Tetric N Ceram). In addition, the depth of cure of the two bulk-fill resin composites was also investigated. The materials were prepared and tested for the mechanical properties following ISO 4049:2009. Microhardness and depth of cure were measured using Vickers hardness tester. Compressive and flexural strength were tested using a universal testing machine. To determine the depth of cure, microhardness of the bulk-fill composites were measured as a function of selected depth of materials at 0.5 mm, 2.0 mm and 4.0 mm. Data were analyzed by either one-way ANOVA or Friedman test. Analysis demonstrated that SonicFill™ gave the highest microhardness value (101.8 + 4.6 VHN) compared to the other two groups. There were no significant differences among all groups in flexural and compressive strength. The depth of cure decreased as the thickness of both bulk-fill composites increased. In conclusion, SonicFill™ showed favorable mechanical properties compared to other composites tested. In both bulk-filled groups, microhardness value decreased as the thickness of the composite increased. The polymerization of the bulk-filled composites was effective only at 2 mm or less.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
块状充填后牙复合材料的固化深度及力学性能
本研究的目的是比较新型填充复合材料(SonicFill™)与传统纳米复合材料(Herculite Precis)和现有填充复合材料(Tetric N Ceram)的显微硬度、抗折强度和抗压强度。此外,还研究了两种块体填充树脂复合材料的固化深度。按照ISO 4049:2009标准制备并测试了材料的机械性能。采用维氏硬度计测定显微硬度和固化深度。在万能试验机上进行了抗压和抗折强度测试。为了确定固化深度,测量了块体填充复合材料的显微硬度作为材料深度选择的函数,分别为0.5 mm, 2.0 mm和4.0 mm。数据分析采用单因素方差分析或Friedman检验。分析表明,与其他两组相比,SonicFill™具有最高的显微硬度值(101.8 + 4.6 VHN)。各组间抗折、抗压强度无显著差异。随着两种块体填充复合材料厚度的增加,固化深度减小。总之,与其他测试的复合材料相比,SonicFill™具有良好的机械性能。在两个填充体组中,显微硬度值随着复合材料厚度的增加而降低。体积填充复合材料的聚合仅在2mm或更小的地方有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Profile of Patients with Maxillofacial Fracture in Emergency Department, Head-Neck Surgery Division, Dr. Soetomo Public Hospital Surabaya in 2020 Detection of Genetic Alterations in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) COVID-19 Impact on Dental Clinical Education: An Observational Narrative Misconceptions, Hesitancy and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccination in Dental Surgeons Working in A Teaching Dental Hospital, Peshawar Presence of the Periodontal Bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis in Patients With and Without Cancer: A Meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1