Regionalism and Marine Environmental Protection: the Case of Offshore Energy Production

SSRN Pub Date : 2021-11-15 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3770726
N. Giannopoulos
{"title":"Regionalism and Marine Environmental Protection: the Case of Offshore Energy Production","authors":"N. Giannopoulos","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3770726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the global level, the rules which directly or coincidentally regulate offshore energy production activities stand out as being mostly sectoral and recommendatory. Global agreements do not offer concrete environmental standards applicable to offshore energy production activities, but they create normatively modest obligations of conduct, which allow States wide discretion in their implementation. By contrast, most of the specific environmental rules and standards concerning energy activities at sea have been developed at the regional level. The role of regional agreements appears to be embraced by UNCLOS, which accommodates and, in certain instances, encourages the development of regional agreements for the protection of the marine environment. The multitude of references to regional rules and forms of cooperation in UNCLOS is indicative of the significance of regionalism to address certain sources of pollution. \nHowever, not all energy-producing marine regions are subject to normatively specific rules and standards to regulate these activities. Theoretically, the absence of such standards might have significant environmental repercussions. Given the interconnectedness of seas and oceans, the success of a regional agreement in achieving its environmental objectives depends considerably on the consistent efforts in the other areas of the world to equally protect and preserve the marine environment. Against that background, it is crucial to examine not only the relevance of regional agreements for the geographical areas they were developed to protect but also whether the regional rules and standards can offer solutions, which may be applicable in other marine regions. In particular, it is important to assess the legal relevance of these region-specific rules and standards for other marine areas, for which there are no specific rules on the environmental regulation of offshore energy production activities. \nThe aim of this paper is two-fold as it purports to examine the role of regional agreements for the regulation of offshore energy production activities both within and beyond their geographical scope of application. On that account, the contribution first examines the role of regional agreements in identifying, adapting and updating the standard of diligence that States must exercise in the respective marine areas. In that respect, it briefly discusses the relevant normative and institutional developments in four selected regions, namely the Mediterranean Sea, the Baltic Sea, the North-East Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean. Drawing on these developments, it extrapolates the significant contribution of the regional agreements in developing future-proof and inclusive regulation of offshore energy production activities. In addition, the paper posits that insofar as these regional agreements could inform the interpretation of the duty to protect the marine environment in the context of offshore energy production under UNCLOS, they could also shape the required standard of care at the global level. For that reason, it discusses whether, and under which conditions, regional rules and standards inform and enrich the interpretation and implementation of the duty to protect the marine environment under UNCLOS.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3770726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

At the global level, the rules which directly or coincidentally regulate offshore energy production activities stand out as being mostly sectoral and recommendatory. Global agreements do not offer concrete environmental standards applicable to offshore energy production activities, but they create normatively modest obligations of conduct, which allow States wide discretion in their implementation. By contrast, most of the specific environmental rules and standards concerning energy activities at sea have been developed at the regional level. The role of regional agreements appears to be embraced by UNCLOS, which accommodates and, in certain instances, encourages the development of regional agreements for the protection of the marine environment. The multitude of references to regional rules and forms of cooperation in UNCLOS is indicative of the significance of regionalism to address certain sources of pollution. However, not all energy-producing marine regions are subject to normatively specific rules and standards to regulate these activities. Theoretically, the absence of such standards might have significant environmental repercussions. Given the interconnectedness of seas and oceans, the success of a regional agreement in achieving its environmental objectives depends considerably on the consistent efforts in the other areas of the world to equally protect and preserve the marine environment. Against that background, it is crucial to examine not only the relevance of regional agreements for the geographical areas they were developed to protect but also whether the regional rules and standards can offer solutions, which may be applicable in other marine regions. In particular, it is important to assess the legal relevance of these region-specific rules and standards for other marine areas, for which there are no specific rules on the environmental regulation of offshore energy production activities. The aim of this paper is two-fold as it purports to examine the role of regional agreements for the regulation of offshore energy production activities both within and beyond their geographical scope of application. On that account, the contribution first examines the role of regional agreements in identifying, adapting and updating the standard of diligence that States must exercise in the respective marine areas. In that respect, it briefly discusses the relevant normative and institutional developments in four selected regions, namely the Mediterranean Sea, the Baltic Sea, the North-East Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean. Drawing on these developments, it extrapolates the significant contribution of the regional agreements in developing future-proof and inclusive regulation of offshore energy production activities. In addition, the paper posits that insofar as these regional agreements could inform the interpretation of the duty to protect the marine environment in the context of offshore energy production under UNCLOS, they could also shape the required standard of care at the global level. For that reason, it discusses whether, and under which conditions, regional rules and standards inform and enrich the interpretation and implementation of the duty to protect the marine environment under UNCLOS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域主义与海洋环境保护:以海上能源生产为例
在全球一级,直接或巧合地管理近海能源生产活动的规则主要是部门性和建议性的。全球协定没有提出适用于近海能源生产活动的具体环境标准,但它们规定了规范上适度的行为义务,使各国在执行方面有广泛的自由裁量权。相比之下,大多数关于海上能源活动的具体环境规则和标准都是在区域一级制定的。《联合国海洋法公约》似乎接受了区域协定的作用,它容纳并在某些情况下鼓励制定保护海洋环境的区域协定。《联合国海洋法公约》中大量提及区域规则和合作形式,表明了区域主义对解决某些污染源的重要性。然而,并非所有产能海洋区域都有规范的具体规则和标准来管理这些活动。从理论上讲,缺乏此类标准可能会对环境产生重大影响。鉴于海洋的相互联系,一项区域协定在实现其环境目标方面的成功在很大程度上取决于世界其他地区同样保护和养护海洋环境的持续努力。在这种背景下,至关重要的是不仅要审查区域协定对其所保护的地理区域的相关性,而且要审查区域规则和标准是否能够提供可能适用于其他海洋区域的解决办法。特别重要的是评估这些区域特定规则和标准对其他海洋地区的法律相关性,因为这些地区没有关于近海能源生产活动的环境管制的具体规则。本文的目的是双重的,因为它旨在审查区域协定在其地理适用范围内外对海上能源生产活动进行监管的作用。因此,报告首先审查了区域协定在确定、调整和更新各国必须在各自海洋区域内实行的勤勉标准方面的作用。在这方面,它简要讨论了四个选定区域,即地中海、波罗的海、东北大西洋和北冰洋的有关规范和体制发展情况。根据这些发展,它推断了区域协议在制定海上能源生产活动的未来和包容性监管方面的重大贡献。此外,该论文认为,只要这些区域协议可以为《联合国海洋法公约》规定的海上能源生产背景下保护海洋环境的义务提供解释,它们也可以在全球层面上形成所需的保护标准。因此,它讨论了区域规则和标准是否以及在何种条件下为《公约》规定的海洋环境保护义务的解释和实施提供了信息和丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stocks as a Hedge against Inflation: Does Corporate Profitability Keep Up with Inflation? How Useful Is a Prospectus in Identifying Greenwashing versus True ESG Funds? Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing The Hidden Cost in Costless Put-Spread Collars: Rebalance Timing Luck Investing in Carbon Credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1