Net Neutrality Is Bad Broadband Regulation

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Economists Voice Pub Date : 2010-09-14 DOI:10.2202/1553-3832.1777
R. Litan, Hal J. Singer
{"title":"Net Neutrality Is Bad Broadband Regulation","authors":"R. Litan, Hal J. Singer","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With America desperate for jobs, now is the worst time for the Federal Communications Commission to be imposing “net-neutrality” and potentially scaring away billions of dollars in telecommunications investment, according to Robert Litan of the Kauffman Foundation and Brookings Institution and Hal Singer of Navigant Economics.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1777","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economists Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With America desperate for jobs, now is the worst time for the Federal Communications Commission to be imposing “net-neutrality” and potentially scaring away billions of dollars in telecommunications investment, according to Robert Litan of the Kauffman Foundation and Brookings Institution and Hal Singer of Navigant Economics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络中立是糟糕的宽带监管
考夫曼基金会和布鲁金斯学会的罗伯特•利坦以及Navigant Economics的哈尔•辛格认为,由于美国人迫切需要就业机会,现在是联邦通信委员会实施“网络中立”的最糟糕时机,这可能会让数十亿美元的电信投资流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economists Voice
Economists Voice ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.
期刊最新文献
Natural Interest Rate and Money Interest Rates An Evolutionary Path Towards a European Monetary Fund The Fairy Tale of Low Inflation in the Euro Area Food Insecurity and Health Outcomes The Economists’ Voice: Special Issue on Nutrition and Poverty Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1