UNDER-BODY FORCED-AIR WARMING BLANKET VERSUS RESISTIVE HEATING BLANKET FOR PREVENTION OF HYPOTHERMIA DURING SPINAL SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Shariffuddin, Hasan Ms, C. Th, Kwan Mk, Chan Yk
{"title":"UNDER-BODY FORCED-AIR WARMING BLANKET VERSUS RESISTIVE HEATING BLANKET FOR PREVENTION OF HYPOTHERMIA DURING SPINAL SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE STUDY","authors":"Shariffuddin, Hasan Ms, C. Th, Kwan Mk, Chan Yk","doi":"10.22452/JUMMEC.VOL19NO1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground:Prevention of hypothermia in patients undergoing major posterior approach spinal surgery can be difficult, as alarge body surface is exposed to the cold environment of the operating theatre. We compared the efficacy of anew under-body forced-air warming blanket with that of a resistive heating blanket in preventing hypothermia.Methods:Sixty patients undergoing major posterior approach spinal surgery lasting for more than 2 hours were randomlyassigned to warming with a full under-body forced-air warming blanket or three segments of resistive heatingblankets, both set at 42°C. The ambient temperature was kept near 20°C. Nasopharyngeal, rectal and axillarytemperatures were measured at regular intervals. Changes in core temperature (average of nasopharyngealand rectal) over time were compared by the independent t-test.Results:The characteristics of the patients were comparable. The baseline core temperature was 36.36 ±0.38°C in theforced-air group and 36.27 ± 0.46°C in the resistive heating group. During the first hour, the core temperaturedecreased similarly from baseline in both groups. From 100 minutes after induction until the end of the surgery,core temperature rose in both groups. At the end of surgery, the core temperature was increased by 0.08± 0.09°C from baseline in the forced-air group but decreased by 0.40 ±0.04°C from baseline in the resistiveheating group. The difference in the change of the core temperature, at the end of the surgery, between thetwo groups is statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:We demonstrated that the new under-body forced-air warming blanket is superior to the resistive heatingblanket in preventing hypothermia in patients undergoing major posterior approach spinal surgery.","PeriodicalId":39135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the University of Malaya Medical Centre","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the University of Malaya Medical Centre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/JUMMEC.VOL19NO1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground:Prevention of hypothermia in patients undergoing major posterior approach spinal surgery can be difficult, as alarge body surface is exposed to the cold environment of the operating theatre. We compared the efficacy of anew under-body forced-air warming blanket with that of a resistive heating blanket in preventing hypothermia.Methods:Sixty patients undergoing major posterior approach spinal surgery lasting for more than 2 hours were randomlyassigned to warming with a full under-body forced-air warming blanket or three segments of resistive heatingblankets, both set at 42°C. The ambient temperature was kept near 20°C. Nasopharyngeal, rectal and axillarytemperatures were measured at regular intervals. Changes in core temperature (average of nasopharyngealand rectal) over time were compared by the independent t-test.Results:The characteristics of the patients were comparable. The baseline core temperature was 36.36 ±0.38°C in theforced-air group and 36.27 ± 0.46°C in the resistive heating group. During the first hour, the core temperaturedecreased similarly from baseline in both groups. From 100 minutes after induction until the end of the surgery,core temperature rose in both groups. At the end of surgery, the core temperature was increased by 0.08± 0.09°C from baseline in the forced-air group but decreased by 0.40 ±0.04°C from baseline in the resistiveheating group. The difference in the change of the core temperature, at the end of the surgery, between thetwo groups is statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:We demonstrated that the new under-body forced-air warming blanket is superior to the resistive heatingblanket in preventing hypothermia in patients undergoing major posterior approach spinal surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在脊柱手术中,体下强制空气加热毯与电阻式加热毯预防体温过低:一项随机前瞻性研究
摘要背景:由于患者体表暴露在手术室的寒冷环境中,在进行脊柱后路手术的患者中,预防低体温是很困难的。我们比较了新的体下强制空气加热毯和电阻式加热毯在预防体温过低方面的功效。方法:60例接受大后路脊柱手术持续时间超过2小时的患者被随机分配到42°C的全身下强制空气加热毯或三段电阻加热毯进行加热。环境温度保持在20℃左右。定期测量鼻咽、直肠和腋窝温度。核心温度(鼻咽部和直肠的平均值)随时间的变化通过独立t检验进行比较。结果:两组患者的特征具有可比性。强迫空气组和电阻加热组的基线核心温度分别为36.36±0.38°C和36.27±0.46°C。在第一个小时内,两组的核心温度从基线下降相似。诱导后100分钟至手术结束,两组核心温度均升高。手术结束时,加压空气组核心温度较基线升高0.08±0.09°C,电阻加热组核心温度较基线下降0.40±0.04°C。两组患者手术结束时核心温度变化差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:我们证明了新型体下强制空气加热毯在预防大后路脊柱手术患者的低温方面优于电阻式加热毯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH RISK COVID-19 PATIENTS USING HEMATOLOGICAL INDICES THE IMPACT OF MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON HEALTHCARE UTILISATION: HOW DOES THE PROJECTED PATIENT WORKLOAD COMPARED TO THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS IN CARE? AGE DIFFERENCE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ADOPTION RATE OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES AGAINST COVID-19 IN MALAYSIA MENTAL HEALTH AMONG HOSPITAL STAFF DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN A THAI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL UPDATE ON RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTING FOR COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1