Dimensionality and measurement invariance of the Serbian version of the BDI-II: An IRT approach

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psihologija Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/psi200318027j
Bojan Janicic, Ljiljana Mihić, Z. Novović
{"title":"Dimensionality and measurement invariance of the Serbian version of the BDI-II: An IRT approach","authors":"Bojan Janicic, Ljiljana Mihić, Z. Novović","doi":"10.2298/psi200318027j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been debates about the dimensionality of the Beck?s Depression Inventory-II, its appropriate scoring, and gender-related measurement invariance. We addressed these questions employing the Item Response Theory approach in a clinical sample of 288 patients, using a Serbian version of the BDI-II. We tested nine structural models using confirmatory Full Information Factor Analysis and IRT Graded Response Model. We concluded that the BDI-II is essentially unidimensional. All items had high discrimination, and the test was most informative in the medium range of depression severity in the clinical sample. Although small to medium gender related differential item functioning existed in several items, it did not affect the total score. Hence, the total score of the Serbian translation of the BDI-II is comparable between genders as a measure of severity of depression.","PeriodicalId":45301,"journal":{"name":"Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/psi200318027j","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There have been debates about the dimensionality of the Beck?s Depression Inventory-II, its appropriate scoring, and gender-related measurement invariance. We addressed these questions employing the Item Response Theory approach in a clinical sample of 288 patients, using a Serbian version of the BDI-II. We tested nine structural models using confirmatory Full Information Factor Analysis and IRT Graded Response Model. We concluded that the BDI-II is essentially unidimensional. All items had high discrimination, and the test was most informative in the medium range of depression severity in the clinical sample. Although small to medium gender related differential item functioning existed in several items, it did not affect the total score. Hence, the total score of the Serbian translation of the BDI-II is comparable between genders as a measure of severity of depression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞尔维亚版BDI-II的维度和测量不变性:一种IRT方法
关于贝克河的维度一直存在争议。抑郁症量表ii,其适当的评分,和性别相关的测量不变性。我们采用项目反应理论方法在288例患者的临床样本中解决了这些问题,使用塞尔维亚版本的BDI-II。我们使用验证性全信息因子分析和IRT分级反应模型对九个结构模型进行了测试。我们得出结论,BDI-II本质上是单维的。所有条目均有较高的辨析性,在临床样本中,测试在抑郁严重程度的中等范围内信息量最大。虽然有几个项目存在中小型性别相关的差异项目功能,但对总分没有影响。因此,塞尔维亚语翻译BDI-II的总分作为抑郁症严重程度的衡量标准,在性别之间具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psihologija
Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How do we see digital platform workers’ skill patterns? Evidence from south-eastern Europe Dark, dissatisfied and disengaged: Propensity towards marital infidelity, the dark triad, marital satisfaction and the mediating role of moral disengagement Analysis of the brain’s responses to the approach-avoidance behavior in architectural experience Job autonomy and employee strengths use: The roles of work engagement and job insecurity Self-criticism and self-compassion as mediators of the relationship between alexithymia and postpartum depressive symptoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1