Perceived lack of control and conspiracy theory beliefs in the wake of political strife and natural disaster

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psihologija Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/PSI201115009S
A. Stojanov, M. J. Bering, J. Halberstadt
{"title":"Perceived lack of control and conspiracy theory beliefs in the wake of political strife and natural disaster","authors":"A. Stojanov, M. J. Bering, J. Halberstadt","doi":"10.2298/PSI201115009S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While lack of control is one plausible explanation for conspiracy beliefs, the experimental evidence is mixed. We present two naturalistic studies that offer some limited support for the control hypothesis. In the first, Macedonians living in (North) Macedonia (N = 116) completed a conspiracy ideation scale immediately after a national referendum on the country?s name change from ?Macedonia? to ?North Macedonia,? and one year after. The opposition, whose control was lowered after the name change, increased their conspiracy beliefs, but supporters did not. Study 2, conducted with Americans (N = 266) in the wake of a series of devastating tornadoes, replicated and expanded the first study: the effects were evident only for the threatening event-related conspiracy beliefs. These studies suggest a possible link between lack of control and conspiracy beliefs in the real world.","PeriodicalId":45301,"journal":{"name":"Psihologija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI201115009S","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

While lack of control is one plausible explanation for conspiracy beliefs, the experimental evidence is mixed. We present two naturalistic studies that offer some limited support for the control hypothesis. In the first, Macedonians living in (North) Macedonia (N = 116) completed a conspiracy ideation scale immediately after a national referendum on the country?s name change from ?Macedonia? to ?North Macedonia,? and one year after. The opposition, whose control was lowered after the name change, increased their conspiracy beliefs, but supporters did not. Study 2, conducted with Americans (N = 266) in the wake of a series of devastating tornadoes, replicated and expanded the first study: the effects were evident only for the threatening event-related conspiracy beliefs. These studies suggest a possible link between lack of control and conspiracy beliefs in the real world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在政治冲突和自然灾害之后,缺乏控制和阴谋论信仰
虽然缺乏控制是阴谋论的一个合理解释,但实验证据却喜忧参半。我们提出了两个自然主义的研究,为控制假说提供了一些有限的支持。在第一项调查中,居住在(北)马其顿的马其顿人(N = 116)在全民公决后立即完成了一份阴谋意念量表。马其顿的名字从?北马其顿,?一年之后。在改名后,反对派的控制力下降,他们的阴谋论也随之增强,但支持者却没有。研究2是在一系列毁灭性龙卷风之后对美国人(N = 266)进行的,复制并扩展了第一项研究:只有与威胁事件相关的阴谋信念才会产生明显的影响。这些研究表明,在现实世界中,缺乏控制力和阴谋论之间可能存在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psihologija
Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How do we see digital platform workers’ skill patterns? Evidence from south-eastern Europe Dark, dissatisfied and disengaged: Propensity towards marital infidelity, the dark triad, marital satisfaction and the mediating role of moral disengagement Analysis of the brain’s responses to the approach-avoidance behavior in architectural experience Job autonomy and employee strengths use: The roles of work engagement and job insecurity Self-criticism and self-compassion as mediators of the relationship between alexithymia and postpartum depressive symptoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1